Just asking, is there anyone here that tried the RPD-44 back in Alpha?
If so, is it any good?
if it’s that good, I’d be surely disappointed that the BX doesn’t get anything good for the last 3 update 
1 Like
Its very strong with huge magazine, but its recoil feels like a rank 3 avs in full auto
2 Likes
spasiba tovarish
1 Like
100 rounds mag but need a 8 seconds whan you reload
1 Like
Cant pass M1919 HNG chad gun
1 Like
it will also have 8 damage like the AS-44
Mg15 for sure, is at same level of a bar if you test here in the editor so it gonna beat the rpd wo use intermedie cartridge so 7 or 8 damage and need 5s or 7s for reload because is belt-fed
2 Likes
Try both of these guns in the mission editor - after the recoil increase patch they’re not really broken and surprisingly balanced (as in similar to each other).
1 Like
Don’t worry. Probably a placeorder value, bound to get nerfed.
Allies mains of the Russian speaking side of the forum would never allow it.
5 Likes
“Never shall glorious playerbase suffer from unfair treatment. Never shall an German gun get less dispersion that glorious Soviet guns and never shall any glorious Soviet rifle suffer from capitalistic things such as recoil”
7 Likes
yes i did, multiple times
yes it was, but guns back then had stranger recoils than now
1 Like
I’d hate this outcome but, I think this is going to be how it is.
remember, Berlin Axis can’t get anything good above level 32 except the KT, this statement is proven by the late feddy and AS-44
Absurd
True, not absurd at all.
Is it?
I remember when they came “en masse” in English side to literally CRY about the avs having REALISTIC recoil in Moscow (like Stalingrad)
I quote: “Moscow is now UNPLAYABLE as allies, axis have BETTER smgs (whaaat 
), ppsh41 is GARBAGE.”
I’m not even making this up.
They whined and cried so much as mains to the devs that they decided to boost the avs damage, negate it’s recoil (a bit like avt) making it usable full auto at range, and giving it a supplementary magazine.
Devs also negated Fedorov recoil.
So absurd? No. It’s actually a fact.
3 Likes
Developers react to any whining.
It doesn’t matter whose.
As you can see, they want to add PZ4 F2, which axis lovers cried to the point of impossibility on the Russian part of the forum. And maybe on english too.
Or they just do as they want.
I am infuriated by this stupid opinion that there is a reaction only to fans of Stalin and the great Soviet army.
Stupid retards.
Nobody here wanted the pz4f2 (there was demands for pz3L)
But it is what it is. Mains complained (cried), they came here (English forum) from the Russian forum trying to rally the ppl here to their cause.
English forum guys weren’t impressed, except some hardcore mains.
But still, devs did what they did and listened to those whiners, boosting avs, avt and Fedorov in a ridiculous way.
Like it or not… I only relate what truly happened 
1 Like
Yeah, that’s stupid.
For even in the Russian part of the forum, I do not remember a SINGLE main of the allies, in particular the USSR.
Maximum 1-5 Axis mains.
The rest are all stable neutral.
If you want to, you can read the Russian part of the forum, at least the topics for a couple of months.
Otherwise, this is empty chatter, because you are sitting in your kennel forever, but you are still discussing what is outside.
Understandable.
It must be why they came in English forum: they did not have enough support back there.
But my, they looked like absolute fools.
Who would ever believe that the ppsh41 is a bad smg in Moscow, and that Axis ones are vastly superior? Because it was one of their arguments, no joke.
2 Likes
All I know is that Tkachenko claimed that the best weapon in Moscow was Kiraly.
And basically, you can’t argue with that, because Kiraly is really very good.
And it is impossible to call Tkachenko a Soviet main, because he played a couple of thousand fights for each of the sides in the game.