Rework VG 1-5 BR?

unpopular opinion,

but the vg 1-5 should be buffed, and changed of br ( id say, to IV / V ).

not so much for the " noooooo volkssturm weapons shouldn’t be low br !11!1" type of argument

but like, actual vg function differently:

→ + more recoil

→ - less fire rate

and perhaps… slighty more damage?

like, it should be essentially a close quarter stg less accurate over distance and no auto.

right now feels like an m1 carbine with more rounds

2 Likes

if that is a buff can you please buff the king tiger
less armor
smaller gun
and maybe increase the rate of fire a little given its going from a 88mm to a 75mm

1 Like

I would rather not go from having BR 1 and 4 being useless to having BR 1 and 3 useless.

This was my opinion in relation to all late war weapons and vice versa.

There’s so many ways how to balance weapons artificially. Few examples, recoil, ammo capacity, dispersion, reload time, movement penalty…
(Even VG 2, imagine MAS-36 level weapon but with 0,000 dispersion, mag and 10 rounds. It could easily compete with any BR4 semi)

Yet they take the path of some strange BS “balance”, which is in fact very unbalanced and at the same time completely unnecessary, not respecting historical realities.

It really bothers me because it’s all just one big wasted potential. Just because they were lazy to rebalance the stats of a large number of weapons.
But something like that should came with the merge, now it’s too late… So whatever.

Isn’t it weird how sovietphiles only mention historical accuracy when it servers their interests :thinking:

King Tiger and 75mm allied tanks?

Tiger 2 is completely different story/topic.

Anyway, it could be easily countered with tanks like T29, T30 and so.

Btw. I think the tank you really wanted to mention to counter argue my statement is KV-1. Since that’s extremely hard early war tank (unlike tiger 2h)

1 Like

BR3 wouldn’t be useless against BR4, weapons like the MG34 and DP27 are more than adequate. Not to mention the PPSH box and Type 100 late SMG also being short range buzzsaws.

But when you take these guns and put them against STG44s, Fedorovs, RD44s, Type Hei autos, they really do fall behind and fall behind fast

1 Like

Tech tree “Carbines” need better ROF, close if not the same as the gold order carbines like the Beretta 1919/30/S W Light Rifle

Why?

because you wouldn’t be able to tap fire it.

nor should.

Why don’t put the semi auto version in BR2 and add the full auto version in BR 4?

{Full auto VG15}
image

So everyone is happy and the gun can virtually be used in both queue

2 Likes

i would love an automatic vg.

but that should be like a gold order version.

since to this day it’s questionable if such weapon did actually existed.

and, i was more in line of making the vg realistic.

which as you see from videos of shooting the thing doesn’t go crazy because you wouldn’t be able to stay on target more than 3 consecutive shots.

but again, that just seems me.

1 Like

That’s because the gun is extinct you have information about it but no one found an exemplar still working

Abit like Knorr remese assault rifle

image

Because it is too strong for br2 (upgraded it can do 9.6)
given the greater damage than the m1 larger magazine no
why this is for assaulter when it has such a low rate of fire
cut down the magazine from 30 to 15 or 20 maybe

I don’t understand context of this sentence. If you meant VG, then this weapon is basically for anyone. Not just assaulters.

1 Like

Isn’t, is just a m1Carabine with more base ammo, i used it a lot during berlin early days and I can say a bolt action is better

yes and if the m1 was br1 that would not be an issue
more base ammo that implies you can increase the ammo of an m1
and its twice
imagine doubling the magazine size of any mg or smg
early days and I can say a bolt action is better
than keep it at br3

Like this?

:expressionless:

3 Likes

well,

sounds good enough for me i guess

however, the recoil must be increased.

because what we have in game, is next to 0

1 Like