With the ranking system being a thing, everyone’s ranks for the system are shown on the scoreboard where it can be really helpful for someone to know if this is going to be a potential good quality match or its going to be a really one sided one. In my case I would just desert right away when I see a full marshal team on the enemy and I’m the only marshal on my team especially when its full of privates and other non officer ranks.
It makes me sick that I keep getting poorly armed low level teammates while the enemy is full of mid level to high level sweatlords so I come up with the suggestion if not the team balancing matchmaking. It may worsen the desertion problem and there may be discrimination between high level and low-mid but this is the only way to allow some players to have quality matches by finding another match hoping for the best until the developers come up with a better matchmaking system that’s most likely a compromise between the newbies and veterans.
It a bad idea, If some level 40 like use early equipment need have is freedom to use it withaut some one see his level and start offend him because he dont use high level shit, and not less important have a high level dont mean you are a good player it mean you only played that campaign
A level 40 that uses initial equipment poorly does deserve to be called out, anyone who plays this game at least from the OBT had it’s fair share of rifle engagements and if there is something I learned from this last update Is that getting 2-3 squads of enemies with a rifle isn’t anything difficult as I have been doing on Tunisia.
That’s my main point about this game, there’s way too much whining about “op equipment”, bias or some shit but the biggest equipment your team have is how experienced your players are.
Campaign level is something I really would like some months ago while I was early Tunisia levels when not even a engineer I had and some campers insisted on trying to call marshalls out for not carrying the team (while I still had most offensive/defensive kills than all of them).
There’s already a flaw on the ranks where there are marshals who are low level on a certain faction on a certain campaign so same flaw is going to be applied on campaign level. I have seen marshals that do nothing but fly planes and don’t even help the team at all so there are cases like this.
This is going to be a double edged sword just like the ranking system itself.
@TovarishToNy@Comunistinha wtfk marshal center with topic, the topic say “show campaign level in the scorebord”
and you two complain about marshal, i suppose you need read, expecially OP wo is totally go off topic in his topic
I dont believe showing more stats will help anything. You can be high campaign level and suck or be low level and play the objective and get high kills.
Show me who are bots and who are not would be more helpful but even then many times humans are worse. This would really help in Stalingrad where I’m almost certain 90% of the Axis are bots
The point is not about marshal but campaign levels of the players itself like if they reveal the ranks then why not the campaign level too. Having the campaign level shown like the rank would tell the quality of the team much easier. Sure this is not 100% accurate where there are some low levels who do more than high levels but that would raise some red flags that the match is not going to end well.
Such information is useless, harmful even. This game is already hopelessly one-sided. Revealing what is essentially your chance to win would only make more people quit the losing side, making the game even more one-sided.
I would have much preferred if they stopped hiding bots, or even better - stopped adding bots as if they were mutually interchangeable with players. And no, I don’t mean they should just remove bots and leave everything else as is. That would only reveal how broken Enlisted really is without doing anything to fix it.
It wouldn’t be a good idea, because ppl already complain without end when they see players with controllers icons besides their name. If we added EVEN MORE distinction between players, ppl would only find even more things to complain about…
Who cares about complaints, the problem is that people just quit and ruin matches for everyone. Quitters are the only ones these distinctions “help”, and it only helps make everyone a bit more miserable.
Imo, ranking decorations should not be visible for battles. All it does is cause people to leave if they believe they’ll be in a losing battle. Until the ranking system has an actual influence on match finding ,or some other essential gaming mechanic, it should only be visible for private stats, battle pass, and ranked rewards. Because atm its just a glorified name decoration. As for showcasing campaign levels in battle, that’s pointless. Players will use anything from BA to squad automatics. Hell there are players that are trash with high-end gear. It would only solidify the current trend of leaving a match if one thinks its an instant loss.
Oh man, I hated XVM so much in WoWP.
One of a myraid of reasons I stopped playing. People would just bail in a match on the other side when my friend and I were either solo, or in a flight. If it’s not a challenge , then its not fun at all anymore.
We definately do not need more reasons for people to predict a matches outcome and leave.
I’ve actually left matches because one second I have humans on my side, the next 5 people have DC’d. At that point what the F is the point of trying to sweat that match out anymore.
