No - the Pz2 and T-60 are broadly comparable and all the issues are L2P.
Yes I have seen various ways of “balancing” T34’s - complete and utter fantasy given the nature of this game.
No - the Pz2 and T-60 are broadly comparable and all the issues are L2P.
Yes I have seen various ways of “balancing” T34’s - complete and utter fantasy given the nature of this game.
No - the Pz2 and T-60 are broadly comparable and all the issues are L2P.
I would say it this way. Pz2 will loose to T60 any day, but it can take out T26 and BT7 if they are busy shooting other stuff.
On the other hand T60 can’t be penetrated from the front by Pz2, but will struggle hard against Pz3.
No - the 35▲ is too good compared to hte T-26 that is its opposite number.
This is a statement, not an argument. Gun is almost the same, it has fewer crew, it has one MG instead of two, it is slower but has better turret rotation. And armor is better at the front but also penetrable by all Soviet tanks.
I mean we also have 38T that is even better that its older brother, is it OP? I don’t see anyone complaining.
Anyways, for historical reasons I would kick Pz3B out of the Moscow and put 35T instead of it. But that is me, at the end devs will do what they wish.
Yes I have seen various ways of “balancing” T34’s - complete and utter fantasy given the nature of this game.
Ah we shall see, who knows…
38t is doesn’t do well against anything Better than a t60
you m0m