the USA campaign should also own a tank in br II like pzIIIN,which has both thick armour and a big calibr gun in a turret,also there are too many M4A2s that make Sherman IIA useless in BR3
1 Like
The BR2 should be filled with more appropriate tanks. For example, the Chaffee that can be purchased with silver coins, instead of the Sherman.
3 Likes
A Scott can inflict 75mm HE every 2.4 seconds with the loader perk and already exists in BR 2.
Armor does not work against same-BR opponents.
11 Likes
US has M8 Scott and M3 Lee on BR2 already… Besides Sherman II is a British tank!
1 Like
Allies actually have alot of flavour tank wise at br 2.
Pitty alot is paywalled
Matilda, chaffee, Lee, crusader, AC 1…i enjoy them all
5 Likes
we need more British tanks for the save!
2 Likes
Wait, M3 is BR2 no?
1 Like
but the 75mm gun of M3 Lee is not in a turret, you have to move your hull to aim it. Its armour is also weaker than PzIIIN
indeed we need more British tank. I think the cromwell MkI or MkV can also be a good choice
Nothing at BR 2 has enough armor to matter against any AT option at BR 2 (except maybe AC 1, valentine and Matilda…all paywalled). Its pretty moot.
It also has 2 mgs and 2 main Cannons (one of which is a turret). Its interesting, fun and useful