This game mode is awful, pls remove it. everything about it sucks.
3 Likes
if they keep assault, destruction and train in rotation then they should keep confrontation
6 Likes
I like it
1 Like
I like confrontation, it doesn’t appear often either so I don’t understand the fuss
1 Like
I couldn`t agree more, Ipwnnewbs, darn awful game type 
. Get rid of it and put more destruction on I say, their is never enough of that.
1 Like
I get loads of the game 
Again, confrontation is great. The one with control points A,B, and C is horrendous.
2 Likes
1 Like
Confrontation tends to last for quite a while.
It can be a good thing - more opportunities to actually do something and get exp/improve your troops.
It can be a bad thing - some folks prefer shorter matches.
My opinion on that is a bit mixed.
I can see a positive aspect of it - it makes engineers more relevant for both sides.
What?
he finds it ironic that you think confrontation is bad while destruction is good
Some confrontation maps are just dogshit like Werbig Station, Kahif Cave Village and Gavutu.
What I hate the most besides conquest is actually armored train escort like most of the time I want to be in a tank for armored train and when I’m not in the mood playing the mode, its instant desert.
Confrontation is like either it ends too fast with one team doing a blitzkrieg or a long stalemate at one of the cap points like this one confrontation I had in Communist Street with the match lasted 43 minutes because of the gap between the hotel and the theater where had to build a rally point near it quickly then rush the point and clean up the upper floors too.
Confrontation is fine. Assault and Conquest however can definitely go.
Like the concept of Confrontation, but it’s broken as fuck atm.
It should be re-designed.
The biggest problem is ticket redistribution. If you lose the middle point and then capture one point “on your half” you shouldn’t be rewarded with as many tickets as the advancing team.
Had a ton of confrontation games and we were constantly on the enemy’s side, but lost because of tickets.
Loss of strategic points should not be rewarded with a win.
Atm this game mode favors defensive teams and what you should do is fortify the second from the center point and not give a shit about anything else.
1 Like
Confrontation was a concept perfected in games like BF1 (Frontlines) but for some reason in Enlisted they decided to reinvent the wheel.
For some weird reason Confrontation win is decided on tickets and not objectives captured.
A team can literally control most of the map and always push the enemy back objective after objective, but still lose.
2 Likes
I like confrontation.
But how about introducing the option of choosing match type?
My eyes must be getting bad, I couldnt see what the word said below the jiff. Well I dont know why it should be ironic, they are two different game types.
Destruction is worse than confrontation, jesus.
Each to his own I guess 
In the old Medal of Honor allied assault days it used to be called…Objective. We had so much fun playing that, and had to rely on the help of your team mates to get the bomb planted before getting shot yourself 
Exactly the same as Destruction in Enlisted.
In my opinion, destruction is okay-ish.
It’s a bit of an oddity, and can be a slog if attacking team can’t do anything, but it is less dependant on co-ordination than assault (Where coordination is sometimes necessary to win for the attackers, as they are trying to control both points at roughly the same time).
I dislike assault for this reason, so I prefer destruction in this case.