Remove assault game mode

Suggestions
1

simple as, nobody likes to play this, it’s even below train in terms of how fun it is to play

4 Likes
2

Same goes with train and destruction.

2 Likes
3

I disagree, i like the assault mode, but… it could use some improvement.

  • The defending team should be forced back much before what it is now.
    As much as its an effictive defence, to stay and fight the attacking team where they are, i often see this to be the reason for a lot of lost zones.
  • Also this game mode is where engineers really can shine, building defences. I think last Assault game i played was won with barbed wire, sandbags and AP mines. Not alone but they made the difference our team needed to push back the attackers.

I also like Destruction, i think it needs the same optimization as Assault mode and again engineers can make a difference.

4

destruction is not bad, just that balancing with timer makes it shit.

yes… you could… :rofl:

1 Like
5

Assault is good. Sole good map version of Ver Sur.

1 Like
6

assault would be ok game mode if you had decent teams all the time. i hate it cause i can take one cap, but not 2 caps at the same time. specially when you consider quality of your team. if you are playing with friends, then assault can be good, otherwise it is shit.

7

to be a AAA game: 100 % assault mode

8

I love Assault, me and my friends values XP over everything else, and this mode gives good xp. remove conquest instead

1 Like
9

and solo players hate it… i agree on conquest though…

10

Not before conquest is taken out

11

No. All Game Modes are fun for me. Just one needs to be fixed, thats confrontation. Especially at Kahif.

1 Like
12

The game needs to change its treatment of how a point is capped and recapped like a defender retaking a single pixel of the cap circle while the attackers are busy on the other point is considered recaptured which is frustrating as an attacker even worse with defenders not having their own tickets that they can infinitely spam cannon fodder forever.

Armored Train needs to be removed from the regular matches but instead make it only in custom matches or events.

2 Likes
13

You won beacuse You were defending, You literally only need 2 players to defend assault against team of 10.
It’s so unbalanced it’s not even funny, only games You win Your team is full 10 marshall and enemy is coming straight from school to play with their 10yo friends.

Yes it could be improved, but how fukcing long it would take seeing devs need 2 year to not even fully fix bipods i don’t have hope.

Just make it custom only and get it back once it’s fixed

14

We need to travel back in time and remove anyone who even thought about adding it to game from existence

15

i like to play assault tho .

i love the berlin one on the gardens (long time i dont see that one) and the one on moscow town.

much fun

16

Problem is 90% of matches are with bots filled team, so it’s not even fun playing when You know You lose.

And i don’t even care about winrate.

But every time i try to help someone with booster: Assault attack instant lost game, conquest 5 min game, train running simulator.

It’s so annoying seeing good game being overshadoved by bad additions that could easly be removed.
Map veto is in every game of this type, we can’t even change game mode we want to play.
Instead of solutions we get promise of harsher penalties for deserters which won’t fix source of problem, only make playerbase bleed more

17

I prefer to be attacker tho, and i play to have fun when i play. If i win or loose is second…
But i often win as attacker too.

18

When You play 4-stack or side that has healthy playerbase.

In even matches defenders win easly.

So thats my point, it’s unbalanced.

19

The game modes are fun, but they just offer extremely low xp so there isn’t a point in playing them until you max out a campaign.