What do we have in the end!!!Not a playable and not competitive weapon compared to the USSR, the reload time of the SVT-38 opponent is 2.6 seconds, whereas all the samples in the title have a reload time of 4.8 seconds, just think about this huge difference, the mg-34 machine gun with a 50 magazine reloads in 4.8 seconds, while the gever-41 reloads in such a time. At the same time, it reloads by 10 rounds, it shouldn’t be like this!!!
I suggest that the GEVER-41 and all its Walter-A115 brothers – gever-41m – pavesi-svt – have a recharge time of 3.0 seconds!!!
P.S. Even with such a change in the recharge time, the svt38 will be better than the Gever-41, 3.0 vs 2.6, but in any case it’s better than 4.8 now, thank you all, I think many will agree that there should be a balance.
Ridiculous change to 3.0 second reload, would outdo the currently fastest dual-clip loaded rifle of the Johnson (which itself is too fast as is IMO) by almost half a second!
No, these changes are more realistic, I did not touch the A115 (honestly forgot about it and I don’t know the stats by hand) but assume a similar change to it as the others:
I disagree! It is not necessary to recharge the SVT-38 longer, on the contrary, it is necessary to bring the rest of the nations closer to svt38, I answer why!it will roll like a snowball, namely, we make the svt38 recharge longer, as in this case it should resist the gever43 with 4db, in this case it is necessary to make the gever43 recharge longer, the ball will roll further! As a gewer43 with a long recharge, it will resist 5db. That’s where the absurdity will be, your proposal will only exacerbate the failures of the br.
And what does that mean?Gwer43 has to fight against 5db, and the deterioration of gwer43 will not bring anything good, if you leave g43 unchanged, then svt38 with a large recharge will be difficult to fight g43
No? You can’t even belive this yourself since you want the G41 (I assume you meant this one, not the later BR4 rifle) buffed to a 3 second reload, wouldn’t this by your logic necessitate a 1.8 reload for the SVT-38 in turn?
No, my balance suggestions are based on current game logic and real world attributes. 3 second reloads for a dual-clip loaded rifle is pure fantasy (and the Johnson rifles operator already looks inhumanly fast, another half second shaved of will look even worse on the G41).
The SVT-38 is too good as is, and the G-41 is too bad as is (when compared to each other), better bring them both to the US level of balance, the currently most balanced BR 3 faction when it comes to rifles (rarely if ever seen someone complain on balance grounds for the US).
That’s the whole point! As I wrote earlier, if we decrease the recharge time on the svt 38, then everything else should also change the recharge time for the worse, and this will entail changes in all the batteries above, if we decrease the charging time by 3 batteries and do not touch 4 batteries, then 3 batteries will not be sweet, in turn If we lose 4 br, then it won’t be sweet against 5 br either.
I totally agree with you, but there is one big BUT! if 3 only played with 3, then this would be the best solution, well, since 3 plays with 4
and the deterioration of 3 just makes the gap between b even bigger.
Making the two weapons closer is not a balancing issue, do you not realize this? They’re currently not comparible, same damage, similar recoal, vastly different reload speeds for no reasons, this shouldn’t be the case!
And leave BR 2 in the dirt? This is the nature of the BR system, they are supposed to be better than the one below and worse than the one above, that’s the system. Yes, +/-0 is the best solution, but we’re not there yet so lets not turn BR 3 into “BR 4 lite”, that’s just ruin BR 2…
How about we just balance BR 3 to itself for now, eh?
So you suggest doing the same with 3, since the gap will increase between 3 and 4, a fast animation is better than a large gap between 3-4.
I repeat once again, deterioration 3 makes the gap even bigger between 3-4, in which case it is necessary to do
4 and the same thing is worse, but deterioration 4 should not be done at all, it is against 5
Where? Who! When? ) we are not in the future, 2 against svt38 is already there today and somehow there is no oppression. Your offer is not relevant! Then it is necessary for all levels to worsen the recharge, svt38-svt40-avt-abc and on the other side it is similar to geaer41-gewer43-fg-42, otherwise you somehow get the worst 3 one-sidedly and let all the others remain as they are
I suggest add mkb 42(G) with semi-auto for rank 3, and selective firing mode with auto fire mkb 42(G) with 25 round mg 13 magazine If it needs to rank 5 germany
At least, adding semi-auto type mkb 42(G) isn’t an obsession I think.