The ZB-26 in game fires significantly faster than it should. The in game fire rate is 750 when in real life it was only 500. This gets even worse when fully upgraded, as it climbs even higher to a whopping 830 rpm. Not only is this unrealistic, it makes the weapon significantly worse. It’s significantly less controllable, and you go through it’s 20 round mags very quickly. I would love to see this weapon perform much more like the Bren gun, but be slightly more controllable, since the Bren is a licensed copy of the ZGB-33, which in turn is a modified version of the ZB-26.
14 Likes
And where is My FNAB-43 with 700 bullets per minute???
8 Likes
hell yeah, pls. 
1 Like
I would love to see the DEV’s make all the weapons perform to their actual ww2 specs, but I don’t think that is a priority with DF. Then again, there are so many things that are unrealistic in the game, so…what do I know. 
im pretty sure euthy said they will not buff the fnab fire rate because darkflow specifically wants it to be a low ROF niche weapon
So why don’t make stinger’s rate of fire work like cod14 and only have 313RPM
The fire rate on the zb-26 is why I like it 
2 Likes
You don’t even need calculations here, you can hear how the ZB26 shoots slower than the DP27
1 Like
Sounds like an excuse to not make a weapon like a pps42-43 counter part
Anyways… They would never do such things like that as You mentioned
They need to add an option where you can remove the bonus fire rate from upgrading weapons bc i want to upgrade to lvl 3 but can’t without increasing fire rate
Funily Enough the ZB-26 is probably my favourite BR 2 LMG as it is
2 Likes
I mean there is lots of mistakes in game and most notiably in Japanese TT I am doing a mega Japanese thread and found few like S1-100 is chambered for 7.63 while game displays it as 7.65 or Sig 1920 is named Sig 1920 and not type BE and also again is chambered for 7.65 and not 7.63 while for sig 1920 this is not problem since initial delivery was Sig 1920s with 7.65 ammo but again 7.63 sigs were more common or another example is Type 99 snipe with 2.5 scope which is not wrong but in game model it seems to be based on 4x scope yet it has the same 2.5 magnification as type 97 scope (4x scopes were way more common than 2.5x on type 99) and also not to mention that reticles on both type 99 and 97 are wrong anyhow I guess we can overlook one mistake if we dont that means everything has to get its historical value like FG model I which should be 900 RPM instead of ingame ~600-700
1 Like