Reasons for this update means the game is on the right track

Mess Room
1

As a buyer of the founders pack of the CBT, among other things that I liked about the game, I have so many hours that the game when I restart the progress so my hours are countless

the state in which the game is is better than I would have wanted 2 years ago, and the new mechanics implemented make the game somewhat more unique in its playability, I don’t care if they kill me with a bolt even if I have a premium squad with full health, at the end of the day the game is victorious whoever takes the point, so my wishes for the future of the game is that they implement more changes that make the gameplay more hardcore as they just did by removing the dropshot and jumpshot

16 Likes
2

It’s nice to hear finally you can kill someone in a game same man same finally I start kill people

3

If you couldn’t kill people before this change then that wasn’t the fault of hte game… I dare say hundreds of thousands of hours of gameplay have been done with BA rifles already - I still had them in most squads for example… and they killed just fine.

1 Like
4

But now they are more efficient and reliable.

After all, many campaigns relies on ba.

So it’s always a welcome addition for sure.

After all, realism it’s always what we asked for, and now that they have given that, we are gonna complain?

1 Like
5

The guy said he couldn’t kill people in the game… which is just such an overt lie…

But OK… well efficiency and reliability for beginner weapons must be equal to that of fully developed end game weapons of course - how silly of me - mea culpa… lets make a Puma the same as a tiger - might as well go the whole hog for arguement ad absurdum while we’re at it…

6

have you seen him playing?

no?

cuz, unless you did, we would never know.

beside, i don’t see much of an issue with that he typed.

we’re on the same page.

… aaaand now you lost it.

i guess comparisons aren’t your best.

but as i said, you nailed the first one.

maybe there’s still a time and a place for your redemption.

2 Likes
7

not really, its basically what they did.

1 Like
9

Yeah I’m going to take a wild shot in the dark (sic) and suggest that he could kill little electronic pixelated pictures of people with his little electronic pixelated rifles.

Fair enough - you’re entitled to do so, despite the illogic of it.

Sorry - was the sarcasm not obvious??

You guess wrong

see - you guess wrong.

If you don’t like your own logic then perhaps you should change it

I wouldn’t want to be “redeemed” into being so illogical.

10

with the new rifles buff,

he has greater chances.

sounds good to me.

that is not up for you to judge, of course.

despite what you define sarcasm, many people find it actually reasonable.

which you failed to do so for the wrong purposes.

and i guess i could say the same about what you said :woman_shrugging:

i failed to see how that would work in anyone’s favor.

matter of fact, many people thinks otherwise. ( me included ).

more like, thinking that buffing early weapon is wrong sounds illogical to many of us.

and i haven’t still saw a good reason on why that’s the case.

so… you tell me :woman_shrugging:

p.s.

way to go.

( btw, the attitude of yours of " i’m always right, and you are wrong " ya can shovel it where the sun never shines )

11

Except, of course, I never said that - I said why I thought the buff is a bad thing, in what I thought were reasoned words, and got slammed with ad hominem and poorly argued attack just like yours.

But hanks for letting me know I’m not allowed an opinion or to make obvious inferences from what you have stated.

Appreciate the effort you took to inform me.

12

After everything I’ve seen since late alpha, it could mean anything really. To me it looks like they’ve been aimlessly flaundering the entire time, and a lot of it was not exactly good to say the least. We’ll need to see several consequetive changes in a row to make any conclusions about where this is going.