Would it be better if the ranking system would punish leavers even more so they would be forced to play every match?
i’m marshal rank and can quit 100 games and still be one.
1 Like
What if, you leave a match, you will lose 50 bronze weapon and troop orders.
Or you lose an entire campaign level, as in if you are level 10 in tunisia allies, you leave 10 matches in a row, then you would revert back to lvl1 and have to grind all those levels again.
Then noone would leave a match ever!
The OP want no leavers ? dude make the game balance first then youll talk … im XP Berlin Axis and i maybe leave 75% of games casue i know the end of battle before it starts … dont blame people to leave or go play the “ez” side but the devs to think that a Panzer IV is balanced compared to a T34 -85 … same for MP3008 vs PPS 42 etc etc … people who dont want to try hard will join the ez side each time thats why Normandy / Berlin is completly fu*ed up
So a Marshall with a full team of bots vs hi levels Marshall full team shouldnt leave ? ahahahah youre stupid as fu
And i would say something for me Marshall means nothing its too simple to get it and even more to stay it … but when i see a recrue rank it mean Something … he will be totally useless casue one match is enough to rank up
3 Likes
Grrr gonna buy some T34 and T50 with gold order and grayzone camp.
1 Like
I laughed so much you now owe me half a latte.
1 Like
I agree bro. like i most of the time play the weaker side cause seal clubbing is not fun for me and helping out newer players not get sealclubbed suits me.
But what i mean is that we can make some insane leaver punisher systems like, if you leave a match, your account gets deleted, but that wont help with the underlying problem which is the matchmaking system.
marshal rank are only for reward Wo fuck care of keep the rank after get the reward
can’t you understand it implies i’m better then everyone else also if i see one rank under general in my team…i quit the game.
Keep quit wo care of quitter or rank do what you want
1 Like
Dude i be claer
No one is,fucking interested on add penality for quitting or on the rank
Discussion closed
1 Like
ranking for casual game is stupid.
punishment for quitting casual game is stupid.
punishment for quitting broken game is stupid.
there are so many reasons to quit game that just arent in hands of players. shit game mode, shit map, team full of bots, team full of console players, 10v13 MM, team full of newbies with low level equipment vs team of players with end game equipment. so when they introduce MM filter for game mode/map, ability to get matched with full human vs human team, ability to turn crossplay off and actual MM that match similarly equipped players i would consider enabling punishment for players that early quit game.
2 Likes
10v13 kinda generous.
Are you an actual idiot?
People can still play good while being a low rank.
I get around 100-150 kills a game with 5-10 squads and im Colonel rank.
Even the higher ranking teammates are below me on the leaderboard at the end of the match and most of them are marshalls.
This ranking system doesn’t display skill it display how many games you have won.
And you can win games by contributing nothing to the team.
Not Marshal, Opinion rejected.
10v13 is known bug when players with 4 stack join as 10th player. i havent seen more than 14 human players in a match at same time (when someone quits you can have temporary 14, 15 or 16 players that are “alive”, but those are usually bots).
