Coud u add a Ranked Mode, with a 5vs5 or 3vs3.
With the possiblity to have also ur own platoon members for each player making it a 20vs20 game
And with the extra option that ur own platoon members perform also based on ur skill during that game?
like iff u headshot percentage is higher and ur bullets hits are higher so are ur own platoon members?
Adding a mode like also with 2 factions plating a bomb and have to defuse it like in csgo for example?
The fact u can have ur own platoon members and be them also is a big game changer for pro scene imo.
Since the first FPS games created in the 199x… i never experianced such an adrenaline because u can take over ur platoon members when u get shot.
Immagine making a ranked mode with 5vs5 beable u can do this its gonna be a next gen thing.
Please make it happen and are there plans for ranked?
no, the devs stated a couple of times that this game is meant to be played for the objective, not kills.
and above all, it’s not meant to be competitive.
i don’t see why this game should copy others games when it’s doing somewhat good on it’s own.
the things about competitives it’s even worse, because of toxicity that always came around.
not needed at all.
also, what do you want to prove. your ability in stomping bots?
i don’t deny as i can’t be sure that a competitive gamemode will arrive at some point. but it’s least of our concerns right now. so yeah, you’ll have to wait a couple of years.
Pro gaming for pro gaming sake is kind of redundant imo especially when you don’t even try to blend it with the theme of the game.
That said, I don’t think a bomb planting game mode is entirely unworkable since you could theme it as a sabotage mission like Paratroopers and French resistance on the eve of D-Day, Polish/ Russian partisans withering away at the German war effort in occupied eastern Europe, Long range desert patrol hitting airfields in north Africa for that Tunisian campaign people are expecting.
…Just how competitive such a game mode would be is up to how it would be implemented though, and I have to agree with what other people have been saying about wanting to avoid a hardcore competitive scene.
Well not have to copy another game but competitive would be nice to see it happen.
And u don’t know when u kill a bot or not : ), But be able to take over the bot that is next to u and giving u a few more chances for a comeback is a next gen thing. That’s why i would like to see ranked coming for this reason
bot or player, your objective is to take him out, and proceed to securing the objective. you are not supposed to do anything else.
rather than " mhh is that a bot? no ? a player? i’m gud "
a bit cheesy if you ask me. for competitive settings perhaps you would use lone fighter as example.
but that’s not the point.
that would be more s**t to be honest.
because, first of all, if i’m good, and the bots would be just like me, there would be no fun in that. not for me, as they can literally just do what i do exept, as a player, i don’t have to do anything. and for the enemy, there’s no fun in bots 1 tapping your through miles like i usually do.
And its not about the bots its about having more chances then 1 in the same round that is goin on, not that there is a reset of the game. But a longer fight with more action with more chances. Then dead reset.
We see many games are adding things to give u more chances in 1round or 1 game, for example Gulag, Resurrections in apex legends. But they are all different game style and not 1shot 1kill games. In Enlisted 1bullet is dead in the head directly with any gun. And its a Call of duty like game.
Its about having more action in a short amount of time in a round or mission
“Enlisted’s big hook is that its campaigns are meant to recreate actual battles, rather than “sports-like competitions,” with multiple phases, unequal conditions, and differing goals. “Battles involving equal teams in equal conditions are, of course, interesting as a competition. But they do not have the immersion or the thrill of real battle, where balanced forces and symmetrical objectives are unlikely,” the Enlisted website says. “You may be a defender of Moscow in the trenches dug around the city, facing advancing enemy tanks and superior forces, with an objective to hold the enemy, to stop the advancing army in its tracks with all the resources you have.” How many enemy players you kill is irrelevant—all that matters is holding the line.”
This is devs vision for that game. So no competitive mode.
I agree with pesimism about such idea here. Such mode is not even an intention what this game is supposed to be. For reasons stated above ranked mode (or ranks in general) is a horrible idea that would only transform this game into toxic swamp.
Comparing Ranked and Toxicity is like comparing a peanut with a car…
Toxicity can be anywhere.
Even if u lose games in a public game there will be Toxicity.
And of course its a different game, the point is it to be ranked how this game is made of.
Comparing a public mode to a rank mode is also being said here.
The big question is will there be a ranked mode in the future or not, because many people in our big world want it to see it happen?
You clearly are not getting the point here. Devs never wanted Enlisted to be a game where you compare yourself with the rest of the world. You play as another soldier in a battle and your point is to complete the objective. Not be “the best in the world”.
Yes, but when competition is involved there is a much higher chance for that toxicity to be present.
Even bigger question is: why come to the game and demand something that is completely against its developers vision? There are many other competitive FPS on the market. Enlisted wasn’t meant for that. It can be seen even in Lone fighters mode, that feels just not right sometimes, like it doesn’t fit the game design (mostly in Invasion mode). And before OBT it was almost dead with many bots filling the lobbies. And yes - that was demand from part of the community.
Because this game has protentional, and I’m not demanding I’m asking.
if there is a possibility in the future. To see indeed something that links u to a rank, or skill which is something perfectly normal.
It sickens me that u are comparing other game company’s with mulch less protentional,
and speaking about just killing bots while its not only about bots at all.
Its like Enlisted Testers are like instantly demoting their own game and its not even released yet.
It’s more like we enjoy the game for what it is supposed to be instead of trying to make it something it was not meant to.
If you are skilled player and have big infuence on the outcome of the particular battle you are honored at the end in the score screen. For that one battle and nothing else is really needed.
Enlisted is a game where, of course, skill matters. But sometimes you just get blasted by a plane with your whole squad, bombarded by a mortar, killed by artillery, tanks, random grenades… There is much more aspects involved in defining your effectiveness in battle. How to make a ranking system from something like this? Skill of perticular player is important, but it is not everything because without teamplay in Enlisted - you just loose.
Okay, I apologize for that. I went too far.
Enlisted has a lot of potential. But just not in that matter, because the whole game is designed around not being competitive. And even if it is not all about bots - they are probably around 80% of our kills in the battles. That is why kills doesn’t matter in that game if you don’t play objective.
Well yea indeed, there is a side button saying Game Mode, anything can happen starting from there.
I believe attracting more people and make the community grow bigger is always a good thing to try. Not saying now but it would be great to see it happen, there really isn’t a good mode with some rank for people that want it with a game designed like this at the moment which is very unfortunate , because i have always been a big fan of it