Jumping straight to the point, I don’t think the current rank system doesn’t mean anything. The rank doesn’t show what faction one is good/bad at. People who care about their rank(Idk how many) will play ‘easier to win’ factions, worsening the imbalance.
This is why I suggest ranking players for each faction. So every player will have ten separate ranks. Ten ranks will show which faction one is good at, and have more meaning. Also, it can promote playing ‘harder to win’ factions because having a higher rank in these factions is more meaningful than having the same rank in ‘easier to win’ factions.
1 Like
In general I agree, but whatever each faction is easier I’ll play as allies, even so I would like to see my rank higher
I will always play as axis and allies only if it’s not communist
1 Like
Separating the ranks per faction would be better instead of stacking one faction on a campaign for easy wins. It reminds me of the garbage Stalingrad event all over again.
Ranks per campaign would be better, yea or even per faction.
I can see already 300 marshalls in the Moscow campaign on the Soviet side, lol.