NO.
It can be adequately addressed. At least compared to the days when the 8cm mortar was the only anti-tank weapon that could be countered.
it has an L-11 and the upgraded version has a ZIS cannon both of which have worse pen than m72 on their standard rounds…
There’s many ways how to destroy KV with BR2 lineup.
- GrB-39
- build AT gun with engineers
- tanks such as Puma, Pz III N, Pz. III J1, Marder III.
- any plane with bomb load
- Any soldier with TnT/EP and proper knowledge.
1 Like
Only an idiot with poor skills would target the hull
A person of normal intelligence would aim at the turret
1 Like
Doh, KT2 to br2 then ?
Kind of the point here. You can destroy BR5 cat’s with tossing detpack nexto tracks not much of knowledge needed.
Irony here is at BR5 you could expect people to have even slight idea of how the game functions, yet the BR5 tank is easier to take out with detpack than BR3 tank.
And then again, apparently the pixel aiming and what else wasnt all that much of fun at BR5 hence the buffs & nerfs.
So with what logic we can expect same pixel aiming / knowledge at low as BR2 ?
As I have said, you can just use this:
and do not care about pixel aiming at all.
God fk awful sights, massive drop the left cheak is the weakspot.
I can again argue using this masterpiece AT against KV takes much more effort than M9 or captured german zooka at BR5
Ah, bottom left being the prime weakspot for these ap round, which quite often is hidden in map clutter.
With the crappy AT rounds same applies here, especiatly for J1.
Sure its do-able just like killing KT2 with BR2 plane.
But that never was the point was it ?
That’s more your personal issue with the weapon rather than objective argument.
I honestly don’t understand what’s your point, lol. You don’t need to put some incredible effort to destroy KV.
But you can keep crying if that’s what you want.
Well it really takes some adamnpee level mental gymnastics to argue grb usability is as easy as zooka or captured germut weapon.
Kinda explained here, but get your crayons ready if you still miss the point il start making coloring book for you.
Detpack nexto track or requiring TNT to do it effectively.
Differency is a specific tool at low as BR3 required compared to easy as toss it nexto at BR5.
Perhaps you should just focus on whining about wrong costumes in tunisia, clearly such complicated questions about balance is too much for you.
This is not unique only to KV. Majority of Russian BR3+ tanks are way harder to kill with EP than german counterparts.
Yet you are extremely focused on KV. 
For all I care, every each one of them can be nerfed to point that they are easy as germut counterpart.
Probably because at low as BR2 you really cant expect to people know that dealing with KV requires TNT to do it effectively.
Especiatly if such is not even needed at BR5 on cats.
Maybe, but I really don’t think it’s needed.
Then tell them. Problem solved.
Thank god at this point no one cares what u think is needed.
Off you go to teach new enlisted players.
Id rather nerf the KV, but if you are willing to go thru such effort as teaching newplayers then good for you.
Just dont know why you are wasting your time here as you could be spending all this time teaching new players.
What kind of nerf do you suggest?
The insane durability against detpack for starters ?
The fact that you can take out endgame tank with detpack easy as tossing it nexto it but cant do same on low level tank cant really be explained with any level of mental gymnastics.
The explanation is quite simple, the EP has a penetration of only 35mm .
But what do I know
No problem, make the KV have 30mm then.
Or alternatively buff the detpack, just like zooka.
its unplayable on br4. on br3 it performs like it did historically & is dealt with by attacking its weak spots: turret cheeks & bombing.
also it has a weak cannon for br3.
1 Like
So if that shot was so easy to do and so reliable to kill the tank then why are you missing 10 rounds of AP? Could it be that the 50mm is to weak to quickly kill the tank in a timely manner as I said?
Why must it be destroyed quickly?
They may not be able to replace members as fast as your reload speed.
You are fully capable of moving quickly after shooting until you kill all the opponent’s members or until there are not enough people to maintain the KV1 function.
And I have to demonstrate which places can be penetrated
You can see that at least 9 out of 10 rounds clearly penetrated KV1.
Doesn’t this mean that the penetration rate is very high?