No offence but “ha ha stupid German mains say 10% damage reduction matters” doesn’t sound like agreeing. (Mostly the other guy does this.)
2 Likes
Any extra power is an injustice, although I think German main is stupid, they complain about body armor in BR5 when they have KT and MG42100. But I agree with complaining about them in low br.
I think the fairest thing to do is to remove the body armor effect and have the Soviets get the T44 100 and 20 rounds AVS.
1 Like
Well, I could say that soviet mains are stupid because they complain about KT even when they have other good stuff and some do this even when discussing low BRs. And that happens since the dawn of time.
6 Likes
I believe there are more intelligent people in soviet main, I’ve seen many of them who are in favor of removing body armor. But just mention a nerf or removing KT. Then suddenly dozens of people will rush at you.
And finally, I enjoy playing on all sides, but I try to protect the rights of the Americans and English in the community. They are very neglected.
From what I see here they are the minority. But I certainly don’t have a full picture.
I don’t recall even one post about nerfing KT, at least any recent one.
And removing things from the game is counterproductive.
Well I’ll try that later, a topic about the KT reload speed nerf.
Mostly if not all tanks stats except for few use reload stats from WT so it is highly unlikely that RoF be nerfed.
4 Likes
not really on BR5
you are behaving like everyone has laser accuracy with every bullet when in full auto mode. it is easier to hit enemy with first bullet than with every other bullet that comes after it cause of recoil and dispersion.
i have mentioned before that they should have never introduced KT(H) cause it was OP and without normal counter in other nations. KT(P) was ok.
now KT(H) is ok against US cause US has super pershing, but it is still OP against soviets cause IS2 has large reload for its counterpart. people have proposed t44-100 as TT alternative.
agree with this, but instead i am for 20 round AVT40.
i agree with KT, but i dont agree with mg42 100 as an argument. rd44 is still best “MG” for BR5 cause it is basically AR with slight sprint nerf. mg42 probably only has advantage on players without vitality.
4 Likes
Yes, I know this will never happen, I just want to show him the reaction of the German main.
Don’t you think the MG 42 is the best MG in the game and history? Hans hates you.
1 Like
Here we go again with that German main meme. I play every nation and can see that Germany is vastly inferior to both Soviets and Americans or even Japan with their SF rifle, Tokyo Arsenal and Kikka.
King Tiger can be easily destroyed , tanks are most vulnerable things you can spawn us especially after BR3, at BR1-2 you can still survive weak AT gunner pocket launchers but not at BR5 where in one second you can explode at any time. Map reworks make your vehicles even less useful and jets can also murder you instantly as they fly so fast dropping their payloads every 40secs.
MG42 100 is only great at close distances after 15m you lose your accuracy unless you are always using bipod. RD-44 dominates MG42 100 in most situations. And i could even use more than 3 of them with 2x premium lmg squads but that would be just cheating.
sure
won’t change much as it would be pretty similar to T-34-100. But don’t mind seeing more variety as it’s just t-34-100 all day long every time you play BR5 Soviets
So they will have superior, smg, mg, ar and also sf rifle. Yeah nice balance.
1 Like
If we ignore ammunition, imo MG34 is better german MG. One BR lower (50 round variants), faster reload, better rof, otherwise marginal differences. Only the sights are an issue but you can get used to them.
And I say this as MG42 fanboy. Sadly this gun has nothing special to it.
3 Likes
Poor Hans he probably has complex of Soviet Terminators being able to carry two superior MGs at same time plus also cosplay as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
2 Likes
there are at least 2 MG better than mg42 in game. stinger and rd44. m1919a6 is debatable for position of third.
stinger has better ROF(for those who want it), extremely better recoil and double ammo.
rd44 is basically AR with 100 round magazine with slight sprint nerf.
m1919a6 is debatable for third place with mg42 cause it trades ROF for recoil and controllability, thus making it more usable on medium and longer ranges when in run and gun style.
2 Likes
Hans never faced the Stinger in real life since that were the Japanese.
MG42 is also sidegrade to MG34 with 100 higher rof for higher BR rating and worse recoil, which is pretty meh. The MG34 mickey mouse is far better and the 100rd MG42 is only good because it has 100 rounds.
4 Likes
I am a German main, and I acknowledge that AVS/AVT should get 20 rounders, and Soviet BR5 needs something that doesn’t reload for ever.
Also I was the first that was against Tiger II H being added.
1 Like
As I said, these arguments are stupid. In that case, I’m going to suggest giving the Soviets a Russian bias super soldier with 500% more HP, argument? You can kill it with 5 FG 42 bullets!
it’s event, many players dont have it. and t44 have better armor. At least you won’t be an easy target for German BR3 tanks!
Just kidding! the best MG is definitely the stinger. Although I personally believe the MG 42 100 is better than the RD44. (However, these two weapons are completely different and it’s really a matter of taste)
So there’s actually no need to complain, it’s just a difference in advantages, unless the situation changes.