Dogs are more agile and faster than humans. Its a nightmare to down them for enemy. Think them likefastly moving anti tank mines. Also they can be used as assault supporter and moving bomb. Devs can copy cod 4-5-6 dog mechanics.
Or sending dog to enemy hard point in a building then detonate the bomb when dog reached the room filled with enemy infantry
No,because no, and because this game is politically correct
No, it’s as bad as kamikaze
And historically it was not effective because these dogs were keen to get under the chassis of Soviet tanks
only if they kill soviet tanks. just want to keep game historically correct.
IRL AT dogs were ineffective, inaccurate, dangerous and not massive - if not for “muh poor doggos”, nobody would even rememmber those (no offense for dog admirerers, I own a dog myself).
There was no use of dogs in frontlines for assault tasks either. They used to perform different tasks, like anti-partisan action, guarding etc., but CoD WaW style dog waves weren’t a thing.
That’s a hard pass. I don’t really wanna see dogs getting mowed down and blown up
100% no.
Never in any game do I want to see this.
Ever
that is the most based thing i’ve ever heard +100
PETA entered the chat
PETA doesnt have problem with killing dogs… it has problem with pet ownership.
What in the world? This is a horrendous idea. Almost as bad as adding children to the game.
well at least it would be historically correct…
Someone suggested it for historical accuracy and the entire thread got closed by a mod.
i know…
now how about adding civilians? just for some casual war crimes?
So Geneva conventions are actually geneva suggestions ?
and you behave like i was the one who killed 30 millions of civilians… ffs more civilians were killed in ww2 than soldiers…
i just want historically accurate game
and answer to that question is yes. no big country was prosecuted for crimes against civilians in war since germany and japan. and they happened often in most 20th century wars.