Possibility of placing vegetation as in WarThunder on vehicles

The possibility of putting vegetation as in WarThunder in vehicles would be very innovative for players who want to camouflage their vehicles to be tactically positioned somewhere on the map like me, for me this works very well in WarThunder, in addition to the historical factor like the Panzers had a lot of vegetation on their vehicles.

4 Likes

Please god no lets not have mobile bushes running around the map >w>

9 Likes

Until you remember that you’re looking out of the sights instead of out of the end of the barrel, and you can’t see anything.

7 Likes

If you really need it then certainly not how it’s made in WT.
My proposition is: add a camouflage kit that can be equiped in backpack slot, you can use it one time on your tank, it wears off after a minute or two (bushes become yellow instead of green), maybe it gets destroyed after a shot. Bushes will be preset by devs of course.

2 Likes

above all things that this game could “”“take”"" from war thunder, bushes are certainly and should not be one of them.

( in my opinion i suppose ).

perhaps cosmetic bushes of distinct different color compared to the map, but unlike war thunder, SHOULD not give you advantages.

4 Likes

ah yes. i can already imagine the PTSD in enlisted that this would cause from just looking at any bloody forest.

image

3 Likes

If they made it so the bushes cover up the view ports they cover aswell, making vision harder I’m sure both enemy infantry and ALLIES WHO HIJACK REPAIR-IN-PROGRESS TANKS would all get PTSD. So yes, I’d love to give hijackers PTSD lol. Jokes aside, we should get the armor and damage model of the tanks fixed first so it’s not as weird and unreliable as it currently is instead of planting a whole forest on them.

That’s what would happen.
It’s the case in War Thunder but only if you manually set the option to use your real optics instead of having your camera inside of the end of your barrel. Which really shouldn’t be an option outside of arcade but the devs insisted that parallax was too big an issue with things like the Churchill gun carriage.

1 Like

Yes please, realism.

1 Like

i would love to see it!

images

1 Like

amelanchier-utahensis-bush

2 Likes

Meh. They rather sell them as premium for 60 shekels.

If the vegetation cover only like 30% of the tank yes if not no, I’m still upset to the fucking bush tank camping edge map that snipe you in wt.

Cool, if you litter the whole front of the tank with them you’ll still only have 25% (or less, since the sides are way bigger) covered lol.

shutterstock_329291891

PzVi column, colorized. 1945.

2 Likes

You don’t need to cover every square inch of the tank for be confuse ld with the vegetation, you need to cover the most part the rest it’s filled by your brain.

It was meant to be a joke. Just imagine half a forest planted on the front of an M5A1 to the point the driver would have no idea where they are lol.

1 Like

I immagine directly a mobile bush for the m5.

1 Like

I don’t agree with bushes, but maybe camouflages that could maybe carry over from your WT account. Like if you have all the Camos on the Jumbo in WT, then you would have some of those in Enlisted. Primarily the forest ones would be ideal for Northern France, but anything is possible…