i don’t want a new campaign but if we do get one it should be either ww1 or a post war to at least give us a break from constant Ctrl+c ctrl+v and korea rarely is done.
also large tank and air battles can be solved by literally installing war thunder
I think it is still short of the battle on the western front in 1945, the battle on the western front at the end of World War II, and the encounter between Henschel Tiger 2 and Pershing.
I would really prefer that Enlisted stay in WW2, I think mixing into other Wars is a poor idea but would be a good possibility if they ever decide to do another game
I agree very much that ENLISTED will play World War II games. The modern module of “modern conflict” that has been tested before can be used to create a new game, modern war game. Or the Cold War, the Vietnam War, etc.
Just more “go play a different game”.
I really hate that. Make this game better instead.
While I would prefer that the devs don’t focus on a new campaign, I know that’s probably what the majority of their effort goes into. So I would like to see either
or
so you are pissed at me telling you to go play war thunder because you want TANKS ONLY BATTLE and PLANES ONLY BATTLE… which sounds pretty much like war thunder
they are going to go into other wars at some point, and people are getting fed up with campaigns that just reuses the same equipment over and over which is what 99% of any new campaigns will be from this point forward with the only possibly unique faction being 1940 france though germany would 100% ctrl+C and ctrl+V from moscow
That’s honestly a progression issue with the game. I don’t think jumping into more wars is what’s best for the game. Keep it focused on 1 era of history
There’s still far more they could do to expand upon what they’ve built for WW2 and all campaigns aside I believe that is the direction they should go
yea its called another game called drafted
I never ever said that I wanted tanks only battle or planes only battle, that is a total lie. I want larger tank battles and plane battles with the infantry and mechanics of Enlisted. Do not get an attitude with me because you misunderstood.
yea i kinda want a 1km by 1km big battle 20v20 with AI
Iwo Jima, I can’t believe this game missed such a classic battle!
Good indicators are always some guns existing in the game. We have french and finnish guns.
Given the fact that we got a western allies campaign this time, the next one will be a eastern allies campaign.
So my predictions for 2023 are:
- Winter wars Soviets vs. Fins.
Next one: - Battle of France
- Berlin 2.0
- SG 2.0
- SG 2.0
- Berlin 2.0
- Moscow+SG+Berlin 2.0
- Moscow 2.0
- Will come anyway
- Normandy 2.0 with “free” British units
- Ardennes 2.0
- Moscow+Tunisia 2.0
- Unbalanced
- MP40 6th time
- Unbalanced
- Tunisia 2.0
- Tunisia+Normandy 2.0
- Nice I guess
- CCP don’t like it
- Boring and not historical
- Most unbalanced campaign ever
- Ehh Moscow covers this
Gib Korea or Spain.
Because grinding the MP40 for the sixth time is fun I guess
Whats the point of this if you at the end only play on different maps with the same freaking guns all the time``
Thats the definition of insanity.
Last thing they need to do now is bring in another campaign and split the playerbase more.
We need quality of life improvements and that’s it. Nothing more
No campaigns should come out until the enlisted system is improved. There are many campaigns I personally want, but now is not the time.
- none.
We already got 6. I want a campaign rework instead. (Line → Tree)