1.) Operation Bagration
2.) Battle of Kursk
3.) Ukraine 43/44
4.) Baltic 1944/45
5.) Blocade of Leningrad
6.) Winter war
7.) Ardennes 44/45
8.) Operation Market Garden
9.) Crossing the Rhine 45
10.) Battle of France 1940
11.) Invasion to Poland 1939
12.) Operation Weserübung 1940
13.) Invasion to Balkan 1941
14.) Battle of El Alamein/Tobruq
15.) Italian campaign 1944/45 + Invasion of Sicily
16.) Spanish Civil war 1936-39
17.) Chino-Japanese war
18.) Czechoslovakia 1938
19.) Soviet-japanese war
20.) Operation Barbarossa
i would rather not have a new campaign added
most of these would be bad ideas or just copy pastes
how ever spanish civil war and france would be good
but again i dont want to see more campaigns added untill the game is improved more with game modes and more setting to play on also better server
Burma
Personally I’m always torn I’d really like a full fledged Winter campaign. Moscow has winter maps but some have like no snowfall it’s a mix. I would really like a fully winterized campaign like The Battle of the Bulge or the Donets Offensive, all snow full winter I think it be a nice mix up of scenery.
On the other hand though I think The Battle of France or Invasion of Poland would bring some much needed new countries into the game with new and unique equipment that we haven’t seen before. Also those 2 battles are some of the most important events that shaped WW2 and they normally get overlooked for later engagements on the Eastern front and Post D-Day.
The Invasion of Poland in particular is always very overlooked which is disappointing because people tend to miss how valiantly the Polish fought against 2 military super powers who even individually outnumbered and outgunned them
I think… I thought, or I read… that they are going to do one or two new campaigns a year?
korea, we have enough ww2 campaign with everything being Ctrl+C Ctrl+V
Battle of France 1940
can be just added to the current berlin as no new content other then maps would be added
can just be added to moscow as they would only offer maps
can get added to stalinsad
can get added to Normandy
can get added to Tunisia
is a bad idea as there would be a HUGH imbalance
is a bad idea as there would be a HUGH imbalance
most of this was boats
and that leaves the
.6 , this is good but again imbalance
.3 this would add anyhtink new to the game as either the content it brings would be in either moscow or berlin
.7 .9 .15 should be just a 1945 east theatre
.10 this is a grand idea and would reverse the usual german armour stonk game play
. 11 this would be rather hard to add the polish did use horses abit more then tanks so you cant jsut not have it
.12 this i would like this, dunkirk can be included as well
. 16 i would like this be people might not like it as it was mainly bolt actions and hmgs with a few smgs
.17, this should jsut be
and
hell no,
Honestly most just seem like they’d be the same as what we already have just with new maps, will however say that Poland would be interesting, TKS tankettes & 7TPs vs Panzer 2’s & T-70’s etc. would be unique in terms of early war gear, could also have it where one team is Soviet & German equipment.
They need unify campaigns under “Fronts” before adding new campaigns. The playerbase is not large enough to sustain them all.
That being said, the devs will continue to add new campaigns regardless, so next campaign I want is Early War France, which WON’T be the next campaign. Devs add 2 campaigns a year, 1 Soviet and 1 Western Allies. Last campaign added was Western Allies campaign so next campaign will be a Soviet campaign.
That’s not true, the baltics saw incredibly fierce fighting as the Germans tried to defend the Panther line
… so we are going to add a whole new campaign for what?
somethink that was covered in Operation Bagration
The conflicts in the baltics started back in January of 44 with the Leningrad–Novgorod offensive and then carried on into the spring with the Battle of Narva and then into the late months of 44 with the Soviet Fall Baltic Offensive. My point is there was alot of fighting there and you could easily combine a number of famous engagements into a Battle of the Baltics campaign if that’s the route they choose to go. This is all theoretical
so tell me what new content that this would add?
Never said anything about new content mate, it’s 44 alot of the equipment we would see is already in game or slightly altered variants. Remember I only contested your point about the conflict consisting of
I solely wish to highlight the fact that there was indeed plenty of conflict in that time however never recommended it as a new campaign
but this whole discussion is about adding a new campaign so
is indicative that you dont agree with me that i dont want this as a campaign
so then you agree that it should not be a new campaign
That is me merely highlighting something I don’t want to be overlooked for the wrong reasons I never said it would be a good campaign for XYZ
I don’t think it would be bad… but I do believe there are much better options
No. There are so many things they should add to the game before even thinking about going out of WWII, like large tank battles, air battles, certain raids and so on. I am totally fine with them focusing on making a more realistic World War II game instead of anything else.