Main Content:
Player “wtz21h” posted:
“We players want stronger and more interesting weapons and vehicles unique to each nation, rather than lazily transplanting one nation’s equipment into another. I hope the developers will consider this feedback to make Enlisted a better game.”
12 Likes
again with this… super bazooka had ~same penetration as m9 bazooka in 1945. it is only in 1948 with new rocket that much better penetration.
3 Likes
Super bazooka is just a tube, the real deal is the rocket which was developed way after the war.
3 Likes
What is this about?
1 Like
But in Englisted,it is already common to modify weapon parameters,which can give Super Bazooka a reasonable data,higher penetration depth than M9
1 Like
Devs could do that, or instead use a weapon that was actually present in WW2 that was superior to the M9
1 Like
all tank and anti tank penetration are modeled with real life data, so it is not possible to give it higher penetration. we could either have rocket from 1948., which would be post ww2 weapon or rocket from 44-45 which has same penetration as m6a3 rocket which was used in m9 bazooka.
但超级巴祖卡在二战中就有测试过，何况在enlisted中已经实装了不少图纸枪和实验枪，出超级巴祖卡总比出缴获炉管要好But the Super Bazooka was tested during World War 2,let alone the fact that many drawing guns and experimental guns have already been in Englisted. Its better to produce the Super Bazooka than to produce captured furnace tubes
Yeah, thats why M1 bazooka and M9 bazooka had completely different penetration values for majority of their existence in Enlisted.
Nobody really gave a shit up until recently.
they had their values like that cause most of the data in books is rather vague considering that there were 5 models of rockets and it was unknown how they were tested (0° vs 30°).
i know that cause i went over dozens of books and went into army papers to get actual pen values.
Yes the M20’s rocket was made post war BUT the M20 was developed during the war to specifically counter the Panzerschreck so I could make an exception for a time traveling rocket.
It’s just like the Stg 45s were finished post war to see how they’d function, but it was developed during and for the war so it’s fine in my book
Or the IS 3 or T28 were made for the war but didn’t make it in time and I want them
someone already posted alternative with better penetration. t59e3 high velocity rocket for m9 bazooka.
btw here is homemade panzerschreck
1 Like
the t99 rocket pershing was only built and tested after japan surrendered so to everybody saying “post war content is illegal in enlisted”, it already exists right now
if i had a choice between captured panzershrecks and a rocket launcher from 1948, i would take the rocket launcher from 1948, both are stupid and terrible options, but if i HAD to pick one…
2 Likes
While I agree that every faction should have unique equipment, the “laziness” is acceptable because the developers can’t be trusted to:
- Recognize a gap in the capabilities of a faction’s tech tree in a timely manner
- Do research on a unique piece of equipment that can thematically fill that gap
- Model that piece of equipment or acquire pre-made assets
- Add it to the game
- Without paywalling it
It took equipment that was teased more than a year since its first appearance to finally appear in the game. And that is with pre-existing assets.
The majority of the balance-related issues we have in the game is because of how long it takes for the devs to go through the first step.