Good =/= fun and fun =/= good. You can surely bring plenty of fun weapons without having to take the best of the best. It would take away the variety of different weapons, as well as remove the need for the other guns to exist in the first place. I personally do not think this has anything to do with interest towards supporting the game financially either.
To be perfectly honest, I am not sure whether PvP games are the best thing for you to do if you only want the best of the best. After all, games are meant to be fun, and PvP games are meant to be balanced. As such, changes should be made to ensure the game is in fact balanced. Nothing personal against you. Just a word of advice.
I’m sorry but as things are now, I cannot agree to this idea.
There are too few weapons available in the game in it’s current version to be able to implement any sort of weapon limitation without causing problems down the line. Currently it’s a case of, a very short list of weapons are very good, while the rest are quite bad.
IF we get more weapons that are relatively balanced so we can have more variety and we don’t have to give the few good weapons to every infantry in order to be competitive, then my opinion will likely change. But as things are now with the equipment in the game right now, a system like this would only cause frustration.
This suggestion is in a way meant to make those OP weapons less OP, by making them more limited in their use. Risk/reward, I suppose. We can’t artificially nerf all weapons into a level playing field.
You will not have any fun if you don’t have anyone to play against.
I am late to the party as I started playing two weeks ago. But I have the same concerns as the author of the topic has. If at late campaign levels, let’s say Moscow, we get whole squads of Germans equipped with semi auto rifles, I don’t see how will I be able to feel good while playing. Limiting number of troops II or III to one or two per squad will force you to still use bolt actions as game is set in WW2, not some modern shajt. If you want to get high tier guns, pay for progressing through campaign faster and do spend money on getting STG44, I don’t have anything against that. But amusing yourself against others with full STG44 squad is just not balanced. Which gun on US, Brit or any other side can match this?
Trash? Why are you playing this game if you obviously want AK47 run and gun game?
Don’t argue with him, I tried but it lead to nowhere
How I understood what @101737576 said is that he wants to feel ‘‘rewarded’’ after unlocking the StG. But the reward is not the rifle itself, the reward are all those noobs he will be able to slaughter
Just like you I disagree with this ideology because as an experienced FPS player I can say that all players should be equal no matter which campaign level they are and skill is what matters
What I mean, for example:
I just installed Enlisted and saw my first enemy. This enemy is armed with full FG-42’s and despite being worse at FPS than me, he kills me with ease
Or if we add Limits, it will look like this:
I installed Enlisted and saw my first enemy, he has one FG-42, one G43 and four K98’s, his squad is a bit stronger than mine but at the end I won the fight because I have more skill than him