Having 3 separate assault rifles is unnecessary when they only have minor differences
6 Likes
more like,
the stg 44 should be foldered underneath the mp43
( at least, imo )
8 Likes
Both works. I just dont wanna grind 3 assault rifles
1 Like
I would rather have both Mkb42 H and W on BR4 and progression cleaned up, a BR4 item shouldn’t be on tier 5, that is just annoying.
4 Likes
German tech Tree does need some condensing and reorganizing.
7 Likes
Germany isn’t the only offender, Japan’s tech tree is absolutely terrible.
BR2 type hei and BR3 type otsu are a tier higher than their BR.
2 Likes
And dont forget USA. Their br3 garand and thompsons are all at t4 for some reason
Yeah that is stupid as well, only Soviets escaped this, except for KV-1.
Mp40 and Lanchester need to go down on tier 2.
2 Likes
A bit off topic but personally I’d like to see MKb43 at BR4 for assaulters only, StG44 at BR5 for everybody and FG locked either to paras or gunners.
Simply for fluf.
(To be clear, this isn’t possible. It would require too many changes.)
1 Like
Why MP43 and not Mkb?
Also m2 carbine should be assaulter only while johnson lmg would take its place as auto rifle
Because MP was the first designation (I think). Then was MkB and then StG.
So I’d like to recreate something like:
At first only a few soldiers had this gun (early designation, lower BR, limited) but later every soldier was equipped with it.
Wrong, they are in the right order in the progression.
Mkb → Mp43 → StG44
4 Likes
My bad.
2 Likes
StG 44 is actually named MP44, it just doesn’t get called it.