Well, I’m not saying it makes much difference, I meant more in the shooting discussion, maybe you get what I mean.
So with this description, do you consider it a BR5 weapon?
It’s about the time it takes to reload, when you go back to cover and reload, there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get back up and regain control. That’s why higher magazine capacity is so important in our game. You also have to stop progressing when reloading. This is valuable time lost.
Currently ? Yes. It can easily compete with stg44 regardless would it be worst BR5 gun or not and its clearly better than mkb which is BR5.
Dont peak from same spot is quite easy fix.
It’s strange that you rejected this claim here:
Whatever, they’re fixing it, so it doesn’t really matter.
These things are too map dependent. Of course, we’re not talking about gameplay. I just wanted to point out one of the weaknesses of that weapon.
quite sure its br3 gun isnt it ?
Then you asked should it be BR5 and yes. It does qualify as BR5 gun regardless would it be the low end one.
Which are quite many times situations you can affect by how you play the game.
No matter what you do, you cant do anything to dispersion.
Well, my question was about his power, not his current position. Maybe I wrote my sentence badly.
Skill is definitely the first factor in the game.
As said sure, currently qualifies as low end BR5 gun
Well we can continue this whataboutism comparison till the end of day and make up scenarios where either gun excells either one.
But it wont change the fact that a current BR3 gun can compete and even excell BR5 gun in 1on1 situation.
Well, anyway, this weapon is being nerfed. So the discussion is useless. But I’m free today, I can continue this useless discussion until night. 
It’s too weak at BR5 but may be too strong for BR3. There are not a single BR that could make it balanced as we both know that BR4 doesn’t exist.
Yes, that’s true. But this can’t be a justification for transferring BR4 equipment to BR3.
I hope they separate all the BRs.
I have an idea, but it’s possible that most people won’t support it. 5 BR has long been a place of “arms race” where everyone constantly demands a prototype or “Paper Armament” response. For example, in response to the Tiger-2 on the Ru forum, they require the introduction of the T-54 (1945) or the IS-3, and so on. It’s possible that these players don’t care about historical accuracy, which is why I have an idea.
What will this achieve?
This proposal will revive BR 2 and BR 4 (which have always been dead).
Also, for the sake of historical accuracy, I would leave the option to wear cuirasses only in the Firemen’s units, as according to history, who were issued these breastplates? Not all soldiers received them. The CH-42 was primarily intended for the soldiers of the Assault Engineer Brigades (ASHIBr/ШИСБр)
a flamethrower squad is an ideal fit for this description, as the Panzer Infantry soldiers were very fond of using flamethrowers in assault battles to “smoke the Wehrmacht soldiers out of their hiding places.” Additionally, flamethrower squads include engineers and assault troops, making them an ideal fit for the description of the Red Army’s assault engineer and sapper brigades.
nah the mkb35 is actually great in low BR, especially in open maps like tunisia, i wouldn’t call it a meme gun
Havent found single reasonable use for it, radio operators maybe.
Other than that its not that great compared to regular BA’s at mid range and gets ass whooped by spade in cqc.
the mkb35 is only available to assaulters
forgot that one, so not even that use.