Its shouldnt be anyway. I am conviced the 20mms haven been toned down in Enlisted in some form.
Somehow They dont feel like the minengeschoß rounds we know and love in Warthunder. stuff blows to pieces there
2 Likes
Yeah, I feel like they are a little tonned down in here for some reason, but connect 4 of them at the same time BOOM goes the enemy
1 Like
The problem can be solved by just modifying the fuel.
They’ve been neglecting it for years.
1 Like
I do think that is a “another” problem as you say. But I think its more than that, because that shouldnt have anything to do with activating the rudder
It’s surprisingly relevant.
Just reducing the fuel to 50% will solve that problem.
did it fix it with the SU-9? im curious i havent tried since first release
Yes, it’s been solved.
The problem with all planes is all about fuel.
2 Likes
Why 2 years to fix fuel issue on 190 but 2 weeks on jets 
1 Like
When this gonna happen exactly there is so many bugged planes that I already gotten used to their bugged controls 
But most of all I want FW with a big bomb A-4 if they just replace it with Fw 190 A-5/U2 with 500 kg SC500K bomb game over 
1 Like
Surprisingly, it is an issue that has been well over four years, not two years.
It’s for every plane, so the Normandy Mustang D was hard to use
I’m so angry because those problems can be solved by just reducing fuel
I’ve been through this for at least four years
But it’s not a bug for sure.
In fact, that’s what happens because the plane is heavy.
1 Like
Its not just the FW.FW is just the worse case but I can give a huge list of strangely behaving planes
1 Like
Fw 190 F-8 it is balanced enough at br 3 but br 4 is pretty bad
Not just your opinion. I already really really like the Fw 190s, imagine what I’ll think when they also make them fly properly!
2 Likes
Historical Max Speed at SL
P-51H - 682km/h
Tempest II - 670km/h
Tempest V - 641km/h
J7W1 - 635km/h
F8F-1 (WWII settings, 2400hp) - 635km/h
P-51K (75HG) - 630km/h
Spitfire Mk 22 - 628km/h
F4U-4 - 626km/h
Do-335A - 622km/h
Fw-190D-9 - 621km/h
La-7 - 614km/h
P-51D (67Hg) - 603km/h
Ki-84: 571-584km/h (571 japanese , 584 US figures)
Fw-190A-8 - 578km/h
La-5FN - 568km/h
Fw-190A-4 / A-5 - 565km/h
J2M3 - 554km/h
Yak-9T - 535km/h
P-51H - BR V [10 x HVAR or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
Tempest II - BR V [8x RP-3 or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
Tempest V - BR V [8x RP-3 or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
J7W1 - BR V [4x 60kg bombs]
F8F-1 - BR V [3x 1000lbs bombs]
P-51K - BR V [10x HVAR or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
Spitfire Mk 22 - BR V
F4U-4 - BR V
Do-335 - BR V
Fw-190D-9 - BR V
La-7 - BR V
P-51D - BR IV
Ki-84 - BR V
Fw-190A-8 - BR III
La-5FN - BR IV
Fw-190A-5 - BR III
J2M3 - BR IV
Yak-9T - BR III
1 Like
Then BR3 P-38G. As many people not thinking P-38G needs to be BR3, Fw 190 A8 is fine with BR3.
1 Like
YES! The P-38s need a thorough rebalance haha the very first post I’ve ever made was about this issue, the poor E version has been left in the dust for a long time
P-38E is fine for even BR1 lol. P-38G is quite strong for BR2 but a little weak in BR3.
Fw 190 A-8 is a fine BR3 plane just as the P-51D.
I would hate if they wasted the F-8 which can have up to a 1000kg (or 500kg bomb or even the panzerblitz rockets) for just a single 250kg bomb. The devs really would gimp their ability to add new good payload attackers.
Just having a single 250 kg bomb on the dedicated CAS version of the FW 190 does kind feel like adding a B 17 only for it only carry 4 100lb bombs instead of an actualy bomb bay worth of payload.
1 Like
Yeah, you have a point tbh, a 500kg bomb would be a good compromise between BR IV and flight performance
Edit: I just found this pic of a Fw 190 F-8/R1 and now I want it haha either with the 4 x 50kg bombs or the 14 x Pb2 rockets, or hell even the 2 x 30mm gunpods
