Please, consider rebalancing the Fw 190 family

All I need is for the Fw’s to fly and behave normally…
All other suggestions are the cherry on the cake.

4 Likes

Yeah, as you and @_WARHEAD and I and pretty much everyone says, YES, the 190’s flight model needs alotta rework, but once it’s done, I believe that the plane could shine a lot, moreso if you exploit its capabilities the way they were meant to, B&Z for the 190s, turning for the 109s, blood for the blood god, skulls for the skull throne.

But I do really think that having 4 of the literal best AA cannons is quite BR IV worthy haha 1s burst and all you’ve touched is back in the immaterium, minengeschoß is no joke haha puts Hispanos to shame in almost everyway.

1 Like

Its shouldnt be anyway. I am conviced the 20mms haven been toned down in Enlisted in some form.

Somehow They dont feel like the minengeschoß rounds we know and love in Warthunder. stuff blows to pieces there

2 Likes

Yeah, I feel like they are a little tonned down in here for some reason, but connect 4 of them at the same time BOOM goes the enemy

1 Like

The problem can be solved by just modifying the fuel.
They’ve been neglecting it for years.

1 Like

I do think that is a “another” problem as you say. But I think its more than that, because that shouldnt have anything to do with activating the rudder

It’s surprisingly relevant.
Just reducing the fuel to 50% will solve that problem.

did it fix it with the SU-9? im curious i havent tried since first release

Yes, it’s been solved.
The problem with all planes is all about fuel.

2 Likes

Why 2 years to fix fuel issue on 190 but 2 weeks on jets :sob:

1 Like

When this gonna happen exactly there is so many bugged planes that I already gotten used to their bugged controls :rofl:

But most of all I want FW with a big bomb A-4 if they just replace it with Fw 190 A-5/U2 with 500 kg SC500K bomb game over :smiley:

1 Like

Surprisingly, it is an issue that has been well over four years, not two years.
It’s for every plane, so the Normandy Mustang D was hard to use

I’m so angry because those problems can be solved by just reducing fuel
I’ve been through this for at least four years

But it’s not a bug for sure.
In fact, that’s what happens because the plane is heavy.

1 Like

Its not just the FW.FW is just the worse case but I can give a huge list of strangely behaving planes :smiley:

1 Like

Fw 190 F-8 it is balanced enough at br 3 but br 4 is pretty bad

Not just your opinion. I already really really like the Fw 190s, imagine what I’ll think when they also make them fly properly!

2 Likes

Historical Max Speed at SL
P-51H - 682km/h
Tempest II - 670km/h
Tempest V - 641km/h
J7W1 - 635km/h
F8F-1 (WWII settings, 2400hp) - 635km/h
P-51K (75HG) - 630km/h
Spitfire Mk 22 - 628km/h
F4U-4 - 626km/h
Do-335A - 622km/h
Fw-190D-9 - 621km/h
La-7 - 614km/h
P-51D (67Hg) - 603km/h
Ki-84: 571-584km/h (571 japanese , 584 US figures)
Fw-190A-8 - 578km/h
La-5FN - 568km/h
Fw-190A-4 / A-5 - 565km/h
J2M3 - 554km/h
Yak-9T - 535km/h


P-51H - BR V [10 x HVAR or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
Tempest II - BR V [8x RP-3 or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
Tempest V - BR V [8x RP-3 or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
J7W1 - BR V [4x 60kg bombs]
F8F-1 - BR V [3x 1000lbs bombs]
P-51K - BR V [10x HVAR or 2x 1000lbs bombs]
Spitfire Mk 22 - BR V
F4U-4 - BR V
Do-335 - BR V
Fw-190D-9 - BR V
La-7 - BR V
P-51D - BR IV
Ki-84 - BR V
Fw-190A-8 - BR III
La-5FN - BR IV
Fw-190A-5 - BR III
J2M3 - BR IV
Yak-9T - BR III

1 Like

Then BR3 P-38G. As many people not thinking P-38G needs to be BR3, Fw 190 A8 is fine with BR3.

1 Like

YES! The P-38s need a thorough rebalance haha the very first post I’ve ever made was about this issue, the poor E version has been left in the dust for a long time :sob:

P-38E is fine for even BR1 lol. P-38G is quite strong for BR2 but a little weak in BR3.
Fw 190 A-8 is a fine BR3 plane just as the P-51D.