Because then people would complain about recoil I guess. Just don’t ask me how this justifies the stats of the BAR, M1919 and the AVT.
On the other hand you have the PPSH. That thing is a fucking monster and desperately needs something done about its recoil
Thing about recoil though is that the horizontal recoil seems non existent. There’s a perk to reduce it but I have never experienced any aside from the atrocities that are machine guns.
PPSh was decent controllable though. Issue is that the drum mag sucked ass as the PPSh only accepted the two drums which were produced along the weapon. The muzzle flash is also really concerning and the gun was heavy.
All factors which the game doesn’t reflect.
1 Like
I know the function of the ammunition I’m showcasing the pen capabilities of the F2s 75mm gun in just a rough test
Aye this is true and the point I brought up earlier. That’s why I was showing what the 75mm can do against a T34s front plate.
I was trying to show that regardless of if you’re using a Panzer III or IV you’ll need to be more precise and accurate in contrast to the T34
Ya, that thing is the most broken gun in the game imo
yall ever pay money for a squad you cant even fully customize or rearm with different weapons?
The most mediocre 20 dollars I have ever spent. thank god it was on sale.
its like the volksturm issued out the arm band with just that ONE business suit they all wear as the uniform.
“Oh Klaus, not again… and in the same exact color?”
"I am not doing this again Friedrich, one of us has to go home and change!
FOr me it was a lost call. Me and my friends do not play Stalingrad because of this shitty lock of in game weapons by the Campaign pass. But over all more maps in all Campaigns would be great.
Because… “active forim user that have many battles”?
That’s not a reason someone’s word should count more than others’ whatsoever.
Stupid people can be active forim users that have many battles just as well.
Because of you saying no one wanted panzer 4 f2, we can know that you are more stupid than those people because you can’t even check before posting something. Your act is ignorant, you call people stupid because they have different opinion and you think you are always right. At least those active forum user communicate with each other to discuss various topic thus knowing various opinion of the players. Unlike you who think you can represent the whole player base.
Where’d you get that? lol
I literally said above evry user’s opinion is equallly valid.
And yes those who wanted F2 in Moscow are obviously either ignorant or willingly want the game to go down a very dark path of ahistorical bs, regardless of how many hours they have spent playing/posting.
Because you literally said no one wants it. How is it not representing the whole player base? But it turns out many people wants it.
LOL where? And you just called people that didn’t have same opinion as you stupid?
Balance is more important than historical accuracy. Besides that, this game already have tons of historical inaccuracy adding the F2 won’t make the game unplayable.
Balance could be done wirh historical accuracy but devs are just lazy as fuck.
2 Likes
What is your suggestion to replace the F2?
StuG.
Already premium, and it is much inferior comparing to t34 1941.
We have two Panzer IV Es and one is premium so the excuse only holds so much in hand. Same goes to Jumbo or the A13/ M13 premiums in Tunisia, let alone N.
StuG with the right HEAT shell can pen T-34s and would deal more dmg or at least not less dmg than the gimmick F2 gun.
T34 41 would not exist if Soviets simply get another tank such as Zis-30, another BT-7 or simply skip the last tank anyway.
The Premium Panzer IV E have a exclusive HEAT shell. So I don’t think the non premium Stug will get it.
In this case the best thing I can think of is Panzer 4 F1 with HEAT.
There are two HEAT shells for StuG and premium only get worse one. You could also just gib premium StuG two HEAT shell types.
Obviously “no one” is a figure of speech. There’s always a madman.
But if you ask any sane person who’s ever read anything about WW2 “should Pz IV F2 be at Moscow”, the answer will be a resounding NO.
lol here
A stupid opinion is still an opinion valued just as much as anyone else’s. It’s stupid, but it’s an opinion.
What’s so difficult about this?
No.
Said who?
Balance should only and exclusively be achieved within a resemblance of historical accuracy, otherwise what’s the point of making historical battles.
T-34 should have never been added, that is clear.
That’s one horrible argument. “X is already somewhat bad so instead of fixing it let’s make it worse”.
I hope you don’t apply it at your work.