Player rating

Suggestions
1

Player rating shouldn’t consist of only wins and losses. It should reflect the players contribution to the match. It is unfair in a way that a player that is at the 10th place of either team gets the same one point as the 1st place. Also even sometimes 1st and 2nd place might have 10 000 point difference.
What should also be considered is that someone could bot their way into the top rating as only wins are counted.
My suggestion is for example:
The top 2 players of both teams should get an additional rating point, despite winning or losing - they are at the top places for a reason.
Or maybe the extra point could reflect the match rewards somehow.
At some build of the game we’ll hopefully have a system where it is more complex than this as the points might lie sometimes but that is a rarity currently in my opinion.

And as a improvement - until preferences are introduced - abandoning in the first 10-15 seconds while the load in is ongoing shouldn’t be counted as an abandonment. Playing 30 matches in a row defense isn’t really on the top of my preference list.

2

You literally get one extra point for battle here awards.

Not that player rating even matters, most players get marshall halfway though battlepass.
Just look at it like extre few rewards each battlepass

2 Likes
3

Devs promised also extra silver for battle heroes hopefully in next season

4

No…

Because spamming vehicles the entire match for easy xp is a thing. It’s much easier than building rallies and capturing or defending points, yet here they are on top.

1 Like
5

almost nobody is bothered by those ratings. they mean absolutely nothing. any regular player will get to marshal sooner or later.

7

May be before the merge. But now if you are playing for a losing side then no, not going to reach the marshal rank. But personally I don’t care. I am doing better than some so called marshals.