Plane BR adjustments and suggestions

Suggestions
1

A few changes and suggestions to planes in general

AP4C → BR5
Its just plain better then the FW A8 also at BR5,more 20mm ammo,infinitely faster turn speed,much more controlable and responsive,and many rockets that easily wipe points.

F4U-4,BR 4 fighter
Version of the AP4 with 50 cals instead of 20mms (and you get a higher number of guns too),would have two 500 pound bombs (more then the BF 109 G6’s payload at the same BR)

1600px-GarageImage_F4U-4
1600px-GarageImage_F4U-41600×900 644 KB

All FW190 variants go down 1 BR
The armaments are not very great to make up for the abhorrant preformance of the series.horrible turn speed,terrible handling,and not very great of an armament,if any,to show for it.reducing the BRs would be good as they wouldn’t be OP but they could have better value at slightly lower BRs.

G.55 → BR 2/3
This may come with some controversy,but it has a less powerful forward armament then either of the P51 variants and much is slower at 660 Kph while the P51s have around 720 Kph.It also has much less explosives then the D and only slightly more then the C.for that reason it could easily fit in BR 2-3.

BF109 G10 and 14 gets 4x 50kg bombs and G6 gets 2x rockets
This would give use to the G10 and 14 after enemy planes are dealt with,and would give the G6 a much appreciated buff,especially since the F4u-u would be the same BR and the rockets would help make up for the difference in bombload.

B5N2 → BR2
No guns,slow,and fragile with a smaller payload then contemporary veichles,it belongs at BR2.

D4Y1 → BR2
A smaller payload then the dauntless and with much worse guns,absolutely no reason this should be at B

Yak 9T → BR3
Its overtiered at BR4,it should be BR3 like the Yak 9K,which has a better cannon.

7 Likes
2

I dislike most (or maybe all) of this.

No thanks.

3 Likes
3

u should give reason for why u disliked

1 Like
4

I also dislike this. Not because I necessarily disagree but rather because customizable armaments should be suggested instead.

These alterations are just something we should be able to do ourselves. Can you imagine asking the devs to adjust the Rifleman II’s weapons or BR rating? It is nice that we do not have to. The same should be extended to vehicles.

5

D12 being example here, I dont think it helps anything even if you moved it to BR1.
Its just broken shit, thats it. Currently in my BR5 lineup ive got BR3 bomber rather than D12.

1 Like
6

fully agree on B5N2 tbh it suck hard and it require way too much xp

1 Like
7

Can I ask the reasons for why?The AP4C moving to BR5 isn’t such a big deal since most people use it at BR5 and doing so would stop HVAR spam against BR3 players who get upteired.The new F4U is just an improvement ftom the P51D,FWs being one BR lower then where they were won’t change that much.Adding armaments to the BF109s would give the late version purpouse after dogfighing (I even gave them small bombs) and the two rockets are to help balance out the higher bombload of the F4u that’s going to be the same BR.the G.55 is generally weaker then the P51D and on par with the C.The japanese planes and russian plane are just common sense.

8

That is actually BR4?!? Despite having it in my BR5 deck, I never realised that :sweat_smile:

1 Like
9

He is at level 4 because he needs to take off and there are currently no level 4 or 5 fighters in the United States.
in addition
HV Rockets Make Up for M8’s Shortcomings
M8 rocket performed poorly against Tiger
Usually only the ventilation mesh can be targeted
but
It turns out
This is usually much more difficult than using a 500 pound bomb or HV rocket
If the M8 was so good that most players could fight against Tiger, then there would be no AP4C equipped with HV.