ohhh I didn’t know that … and you gave me an idea … because also not to put support weapons like mobile anti-tank … would it be too much ?? maybe very difficult to make work ?? hmmm
Panzerschreck will 100% be in Berlin since it was in the alpha test last year and I loved using it
2 Likes
OHHHH !! seriously? that sounds good … I thought they would put another Panserfaust but more modern … finally good news …
Yeah, I got to use it during the Berlin alpha and it was so much fun to use it against infantry and not tanks
Why? This game is already too easy. I played once today, defending la bre (or whatever it’s called) invasion map. 100% infantry squads, 9 tank kills. Fucking arcade game.
nah 
and german tanks are poorly armored, so…
I mean, when the Bazooka has difficulty penning a Puma because of bugs, I’d say it has poor penetration.
2 Likes
considering allies PIAT, their first AT can penetrate tanker II tank (Pz IV H) while german first AT gun Sturmpistole cant penetrate tanker II tank (Jumbo.), yes allies does have superior AT gun
3 Likes
retordo logic but ok
1 Like
That is not “very good anti-tank” - the PIAT can completely fail vs a Puma too, and often does - that is rubbish anti-tank.
3 Likes
i didnt tlak about puma
You mean when you could wipe whole objectives with it? Yeah I don´t miss that. I do miss the KT and IS-2 though.
1 Like
Only if Allies receive Super Bazooka, other wise no. The Bazooka US currently has, is a bad AT, because it cant damage Panther frontally and it needs several shots to kill PZ IV even from the side.
Meanwhile Panzerfaust one shots every US tank frontally.
If someone argues, that US never used Super Bazooka in WW2, is was made before Korea War, so it falls under same category like M2 Carbine.
1 Like
I just had some fun moments with it
from the information i’ve found the m2 carabine saw basically nothing of combat during ww2, but at least was used.
the super bazooka wasn’t used at all.
super bazooka didn’t exist until korea