These are Panzerfaust variants that should be added to Germany’s Research Tree
Faustpatrone, the very first production Panzerfaust
Panzerfaust 30, personally I think it would be good for BR 3
Panzerfaust 150, the final Panzerfaust that was in production near the end of the war. I am just saying that I definitely think it should be in the Research Tree even though it barely saw service (the same can be said about a lot of things in this game ) by virtue of it being the last official Panzerfaust
Special: The Panzerfaust 250 was the final evolution of the Panzerfaust and was intended to be fully reloadable and to replace the Panzerschreck, production was scheduled for late 1945 but we all know how the war went. It never left the drawing board. I think it would make for a good event item like the Luftfaust, as a late war experimental gadget
They are necessary to fill out those tech trees, but German already has a stellar at weapon in the panzerfaust 100, there is no need for the panzerfaust 250
The AS-44 (Avtomat Sudayeva, Russian: Автома́т Суда́ева, АС-44) is a series of prototype Soviet assault rifles designed and developed by Alexey Sudayev in 1944—1945, they were produced in limited numbers and tested in 1944—1945, but its development ended in 1946 due to the death of its designer.
try again, yes there is one annoying JP tank destroyer never seem as in game
but at least had an incomplete prototype
so show someone holding a 250 or sit down
Enlisted has been on this path for a long time now, I don’t think another prototype weapon will change anything drastically, in the general context of all other such prototype weapons we have in game at the moment.
paper means just that limited to paper none built
such as a written description blueprint or diagra
prototype means just that one or more were built and assembled paper does not = prototype
if that pick is real it would make the 250 a prototype and not paper
enlisted save for the h0-ri has prototype not paper weapons
I do respect and understand your sentiment that at least with prototypes they were “physically real” one way or the other. It’s a good standard
And for the most part everything in this game so far is “physically real”.
I myself have no problem with prototype and experimental content
……but I tend to think paper content would be cool in game. This is about the greatest war of all time in size, scope, and scale where firearm, armored vehicle, and plane technology was rapidly and excitingly evolving. It already has so much content and it will keep growing (hopefully just WW2 because there is still so much to add). So I think it would be cool to have the designs that were designed for this great war to imagine what if
But like I said at the very least everything in this game so far is real so paper is on the shelf……for now
the problem with paper i you can imagine anything, so power creep becomes an issue
the 250 feels like power creep able to kill anything at angles armor thickness and ranges not intended by the game
sorry but i dont want to see a rpg that can punch through the gun mantlet of tanks is sees (area around main gun) which isthe thickest part of a tank
Thank you for the unnecessary “tutorial”, but are you ignoring the very context of what we are talking about, because I did not understand whether you are for or against such weapons in the context of Enlisted, “paper, experimental, one-of-a-kind” whatever you call it. Because the fact is that developers are already following this path. Full of such weapons in the game (StG 45(H), StG 45(M), Walther A115 and a whole bunch of others scattered across all factions). The devs have said many times that if a weapon is period correct, it can be put in the game whether we like it or not.
if you could have gone back in a time machine and held it its not paper
you are willfully choosing to be ignorant, a few lines on a piece of paper are not proof it existed, look no further than the Amrika bomber or 1000 ratte for that, and of course they can do anything they want, hell they can claim an as pull and put in an exact ak-47 clone we do not have to be happy about that or help them,