A majority of your complaints are not gonna make any difference when the update happens the Japanese are being put in their own special campaign category for BR
US has plenty of effective weapons at low level End game Japanese should be able to kick allied ass
here is the real reason. this is number of players per campaign per platform.
axis has ~25% more players overall and ~50% more PC players. PC players are in generally better than console players cause controllers suck compared to mouse and keyboard at fps games.
crossplay on
crossplay off
I’m well aware. You can still get the M1 Garand, BAR, M1/2 carbines, Bazookas, and Thompsons far earlier than the pacific, and in a campaign where the Allies can actually win.
People seem to forget that there’s already a lot of late war gear already in the pacific that will stay unless the devs have specifically said so, which they haven’t.
Give team USA M4 Sherman so they would be happy?
I’m happy when I get more opponents on games.
Japan should get the Chi To or something.
The
Type 3 Chi-Nu
will also be good against the sherman it is already available on editor in basic version
That’s right. I would prefer it since it’s not really a prototype, it was saved for homeland defense and wasn’t used in combat if I remember correctly.
With 105mm*
The sherman 105 also texture on editor
I know, it’s in game files since pacific update was released.
Are you reacting to me or OP?
Bruh, the boys at rifle can pen Ka mi, a level 27 tank. It is good enough considering it is the first At weapon of the faction.
Bruh, this game doesn’t care about how much a gun is used in real life.
LoL, so where is your most Axis plane having 3-4 bomb theory? Also, you said Japan bomb is better than Allied one. Despite having smaller weight, most Allied bomb have similar TNT equivalent to its Japan counterpart.
M2 carbine go brrr
This is true for all campaigns except Berlin and Normandy
Allies are way better
bolts = equalish. USA has mV and dmg at cost of reload rate.
semis = USA easily. Easily.
smg = equalish. SMG suck for both faction, a complete waste of time if you are a good player.
lmg = USA easily. Lmao BAR and 1941 >>> Type junk.
sniper = equalish, see bolts.
AT = bazooka m9 is better for tanks but Japan have AT rifle far better can shoot air.
tank = japan at level 32 only, before that USA wins
air = equalish. usa way better at air spawn camping, killing bombers and nuking though. Japan for trolling dogfight (planes are useless anyway)
The fact you talk so much about Japan LMG and SMG shows you have literally no idea what you are talking about in actual meta
Sir, I call them out for what it is and these are the things me and a few friends have experienced first hand so if you have a difference in experience, i am happy for you but for me, a win ration of 23% for the Allies even with the help of many top tiered players is the experience i have so.
The win rate is because nobody is playing Pacific Allies (USA) anymore.
I play Pacific Allies (USA) by myself as it’s last campaign to max out of all of them and have games with 200-300 kills all myself infantry only non-stop, normally 140+.
Nobody plays Pacific Allies (USA) because when the campaigns are merged soon, everything you unlocked in Pacific Allies (USA) will be basically wasted. Therefore all USA players are doing USA Normandy, or to lesser extent, USA Tunisia. This means every match is 2 real players vs 8. Japan has no XP WASTE because there is no other Japan campaign.
Pacific Allies (USA) is an XP SINK right now, there is only 4 unlocks out of 32 levels that are worth doing NOW before merge.
This is also why GER Axis lose on Normandy. All real USA Allies players are there to get Jumbos, P47, 76mm etc, all GER Axis players are on Berlin to get KT, Tiger, FW190 D9 before merge, USSR is getting stomped on Berlin because of this fact, so they go Moscow.
