Im sure you meant that as sarcasim but you tell me? what problem? what is stopping you from sending it back to the respawn screen in #insert any AT option here?
How many more tanks do I have to destroy? I’m just tired. Every battle turns into a hunt for Pz3N. Every one.
yes yes, I’m a typical USSR player. Problems with skill, all that.
1 Like
Toxic Soviet main talks about imaginary “toxic” German vehicles. Oh the irony. They only truly toxic vehicle are overpowered and overbuffed KV-1, PZ3N was never a problem for the Soviets due APHE shells only American tanks struggle hard (they should receive APHE rounds)
1 Like
Why would it be better vs infantry? All the HE-type rounds actual HE content of the 2 guns is the same
every BR 3 game is shermans, Panzer IVJ and KV 1…
whats the difference 
This post illustrates how a game without economics is fundamentally screwed - the Pz-IIIN was a cheap tank made from obsolete parts, but in Enlisted it has exactly the same value as any otehr tank - which is 1 slot.
Now fiddling around with artificially nerfing or buffing things to try to get some value out of it in a time period that it existed rather than the silly time period it gets to play in.
Sums up Enlisted’s BR problem nicely.
the problem is that no tank causes as many problems as this one. No one. Why do I easily ignore USSR and US tanks when playing for the Axis?
Look how many tanks I destroyed playing for the Axis and how many playing for the USSR. And the Axis also plays against the USA. In other words, I can say that playing for the USSR you have to destroy 4 times more tanks than playing for Germany. A paradox, don’t you think?
Toxic Axis main talks
In the gun reload time of 3.3 seconds. Right?
Cant say anything with that data. That doesnt mean there were more tanks. All it realy means is thats what you spent your time doing.
I have waaaaaaay more kills with USSR planes than Allied planes…and thats only because I choose to fly them more than the P-47
M8 Scott has 3.3 second reload …same fire power
yeah, why did I do that? Just like that, for no apparent reason? Or maybe because otherwise this infantry annihilator would kill my entire team and we would lose? No, that’s some kind of nonsense.
and yet you arent getting obliterated by M8 scott…nope doesnt add up
By the way, the last time I checked, its high explosive shells weren’t working.
all of them are…what difference does lack of top armor make to a tank cannon, AT cannon, bomb, bazooka, tnt or det pack. NOTHING. The only difference it makes is being straffed, or someone standing on top of your tank, at which point you are going to be TNTd anyway.
Well, yes, I can just shoot the crew. Destroy it with artillery. I have no problems with it. And this is obvious. It does not interfere with me playing for Germany. I showed my game statistics, I told you myself that I have a problem only with the Pz3N. But you don’t believe me? Or what’s wrong? Is it a matter of principle? As you say. Soon there will be no more of your stupid principles in this game.
no such thing exists, only inside your head
I agree, next to this.
Toxic Soviet main
you showed me one stat (and cut the rest), that doesnt mean anything in particular. (Also it isnt BR specific I might add).
This is everything wrong with the way you try to “prove” things. You select “one” thing (that is neither here nor there) to try and fit the narritive as best you can.
- OMG Ive killed more tanks on this faction so this factions tanks must be OP ??? (seroiusly wtf)
- OMG it has a 3.3 second reload (forgetting there are others with the same fire power)
- OMG it has HEAT (forgetting to mention there is only 7 rounds and other Nations have HEAT)
- OMG its all I see at BR 2…forgetting that you pretty much only see One tank type at most BRs
yeah nah…you either have an agender, or are full of it.
BR 2 tanks are in a good spot.
3 Likes
meanwhile.
- if it provides advantage, it is unfair, so remove it
- if it doesnt provide advantage, then removing it shouldnt be a problem
right?
especially since there are these things. They are a good replacement.
Of course not as fast, less armor. That’s not a problem, is it?
Read again
Nope I said it well before you
…for starters, 50mm effective armor is a pretty standard thickness at this BR and isn’t enough to stop any of the AT weapons (maybe AT rifles) or methods for killing tanks.
Clearly you aren’t familiar with the t-28e, spend some time in the armor viewer
Oh I see what you did there, (or what you were trying to do) but noo…you missed the mark. You know why you don’t see Panzer IVs 75mm short? Its not armor (because that doesnt help your main weakspot), Its because 75m APCBC short is a terrible anti tank round. Give this thing heat, and move the Panzer IIIN up to BR 3 and you will just be back here next week crying the bad panzer IV touched you and its all you see
Typical “cant form a good argument” response.
4 Likes