T28 is trash, BT7A is event and T50… yes T50is not really bad, bot germans have better tanks than T50.
Also the Soviets need a tank like the PZ3N to support the infantry, the T28 is really worse than the PZ3N or even the M8 howitzer.
3 Likes
Crusader is not available for Soviets. And M3 Medium is pretty mediocre, since they removed commander zoom i no longer use it as you can’t see anything or can aim with two turrets +mgs at same time, plus it’s main shell doesn’t have explosive filler just solid crappy shell so literally any BR2 soviet tank is better than this.
I think they should give that MG in battlepass to the Soviets, it had a small magazine, but it’s definitely better than the Madsen.
1 Like
That’s T28E lmao not T28, and who cares if it’s event or not? Germany has zero cool br2 event vehicles that are available to the players. T28E has great HE shell + 3x MGs it’s better than PZ3N at infantry support role. T-50 is all right nothing special but not unplayable, you have good enough cannon and multiple MGs to kill infantry. M8 howitzer is mediocre at best and dies to a single hit from any hit, T28E at least can tank a couple of shells and has multiple MGs.
T 50 and the very rare BT tank? What’s good about the T50?
3 Likes
The PZ3N has much more armor than the T28E, has higher mobility and speed, has a faster reload speed, the T28E MGs and in general the MGs of Soviet tanks have very small magazines, in my experience it is easier and faster to kill enemies with the PZ3N MG than the T28 (also the PZ3N has an extra MG on its roof).
Events are not discussed, many people don’t have them (myself for example), I only saw this tank in the game once during hundreds of games with the Soviets and Germans in BR2.
4 Likes
By the way, the T28 has a gun reload time of 5 seconds. The Pz3N has a reload time of 3.3 seconds.
4 Likes
You just have to accept that each nation is different. Soviet are better at close range and german better at medium and close range with their equipment.
1 Like
Soviets are the best at all ranges.
well yes, my point here was that allied BR2 tanks are much worse than Soviet BR2 tanks - Panzer III N is pretty OP, but kinda like how KV1 is op only if not uptiered.
1 Like
Not in the air
1 Like
PPS 43 and good SMGs in general are effective up to 150 meters - which is usually long range in this game.
I’d pick a ZK 383 over a G43 every day on all maps.
SMGs are the most important and powerful weapon class - unit class in the entire game (BR5 select fire rifles excluded), if a faction has only the best SMG but all other weapons are worthless, you’d still have the best weapon.
This logic maybe could have worked back in Alpha where MG34 had no movement dispersion, but today you can’t have a faction that depends on support weapons alone.
3 Likes
We are talking about BR2, if you want to get into other BRs, I can give an example of King Tiger.
In general, the Allied BR2 tanks are in a better position than the Soviets. The Crusader is not a bad tank, it has good penetration, it has good HE, and its armor is not too bad compared to the BR. My only problem with it is its low crew size. The M3 Lee and Mk1 have very good armor and very good weapons. The M8 Scott is a bad tank, but it has very high firepower against infantry (I don’t know about its statistics, but in my experience, its HE is much better than the Pz3 N and T28E).
And of course America’s Secret Squad:
Seven men with smg, clear the target with some HE, go to the target and press F.
4 Likes
PPSH does brrrrrrrr
1 Like
Are you high?!?! This has gotta be cope at this point lmfao
2 Likes
I think you meant that the Soviets are better with infantry equipment and are still getting better they finally got there BR2 semi auto probably the best one in the game while Germans got another BR5 LMG lmao but the Germans have way better tanks lol
its Allies BIAS at lower BRs… Soviet got Insane SMGs and US also btw Owen is really good but at least balanced. Then you have the crazy P-38 that is ground attacker … which faction has even close to such ground attacker this thing is better then BR II fighters and its a ground attacker …
Really PPSh needs to be moved to BR III and replaced by other smgs and P38 to be made a fighter not a ground attacker its about time. There is also the crazy Allies bombers at BR V they are not a problem but at BR II against Japan they shred you in seconds… and then Japan has absolutely not enough equipment for BR I , BR II and BR III is worse where they have the weakest tanks and yet no planes to compensate for that… pretty much the game is really allies Bias at lower BRs and put the P2W mechanics like APCs and crazy allies premium squads on top of that… but at least the all factions have P2W apc squads.
1 Like
Guys, you are all very much mistaken. The Soviet faction is strong not with submachine guns, but with the SVT38 rifle and cuirasses, which reduce damage by 10 percent, this makes the 3x9 setup the most imbalanced on its battle rating. This is a secret imbalance.
Among other things, the cuirass reduces the damage of all German weapons by 10 percent.
2 Likes
I dont think any of the USSR mains will actually understand that and tell you that it is just a skill issue. Or will moan how invincible a tank with only 50mm of armor is instead.
7 Likes
ppsh 43 with little buff → BR3
p38 br2 → Delete
pz3n → BR3
and yes japhan need more guns, tanks and aircrafts. I think the reason developers don’t give Japan new things is because they’re afraid they won’t have anything to add to Japan in the next few years.
3 Likes