I do not want to look twice at the same grenade launcher of different size, I want to see Panzershek
Yes, you might think so, but we just don’t need any stronger tanks than we already have. Anything other than them would be impossible to use, as I wrote above.
The m4a1 76 (w) along with the tiger, if you haven’t already seen it.
I think it’s a psychological problem. I’ve been studying/working and playing other games for 2-3 months and came back to play after the update. This dude was crying 3 months ago and he’s still crying.
Literally the only one who reacts that way.
Problem with that is there is no good counter to the Panzershrek, while the M9 and the Panzerfaust 100 match each other pretty well
I’m not saying its a good or bad idea, I’m just saying its entirely possible with what the devs have said. Besides, the Ju 188 and Me 410 are in a similar state to the Pershing, both stuck on the ground in Germany during the duration of Operation Overlord although admittedly for different reasons than the Pershing.
@2662449 @TheElite96 can we do something about @34357084 ruining the posts it’s getting annoying frankly
neither the m9, nor the Panzerfaust 100, nor the Panzerschreck will have any problems with penetration.
What difference does it make what? I just don’t like looking at the same weapon model twice, plus Panzerschreck was in Normandy, so why not.
If its specs seem too good to you (although even the Panzerfaust 60 does a pretty good job), you can always reduce them a bit within the game.
of course it can, the same cannon as the m10, and it easily penetrates 100mm of tiger armor.
You are an idiot, either you will check something before you post, or your posts will just be ignored and flagged by other members.
m4a1 76 - 5.0, tiger E - 5.7
I was basically fine with the M4A3 (76) W that has 5.7 as well, because there is no difference in general.
Panzershrek has the range of the M9 and the pen of the Panzerfaust 100, making it just blatantly better so no, it is not balanced. As for tweaking the values, that is not possible with what the dev have stated.
this is the point we get subar shit but germans get super tanks 2 of em
Both of you are wrong, M4a1 (76) W is 4.7. I know that because I use it in an M6a1 lineup.
I am not mistaken. In general Enlisted is more of an arcade game due to the sight with the punch mark, so 5.0 will be more accurate.
I use the realistic measure because Enlisted is a combination of arcade and Simulator battle. Seeing as Realistic is the middle ground between the two, it makes more sense to me to use that rating.
Okay, whatever you say. Overall, I don’t see a huge difference between the M4A1 and the M4A3, just as I don’t see any difference between the Tiger H and the E. They are the same tanks with a few minor differences.
There is a better engine and better armour. Not enough to stop a panther or a tiger, but makes it more resilient against Pumas and Panzers. As for the Tiger H to E, that one is just an argument of Historical accuracy as the H1 was the one in France during the duration of Overlord. Sure the H1s cupola is easier to hit, but that won’t matter due to the devs refusal to give the M4a2 and Jumbo anything other than solid AP.
or its 76 mm cannon like it had on some models
The same thickness of armor in the forehead of the hull, I looked
Thickness is not the disparity, it is the casted vs welded construction if the hull, as well as the rounded corners on the M4a1.
the problem with normandy is the players,
you should just accept the fact that german tanks are better and allied air power should be better
in my opinon the normandy campaign should be renamed to western front 1944-2022 and keep ruining it with abominations, we already have shit that wasnt in normandy might aswell keep putting everything in it leopards, abrams, sume russian migs and maybe some v2 tactical arty
Man vs. Society.
Nah, you would have to make it like 1942 to 2022 so that the Germans could field any sort of real CAS against the Americans in the early game.