●37:johnson lmg or equivalent, fg42 2
●38:m1921ac thompson, stg 44 or mg 42 75 rnd mag
●39: super bazooka, panzershreck or equivalent
●40:pershing or equivalent, tiger 2
These will make the endgame balanced IMO considering that it is still Axis-biased as of now.
Fun fact 1: the stuart can’t front pen the panther and yet the puma can front pen the sherman 76/jumbo
Fun fact 2: the m2 carbine can’t one shot enemies and it doesn’t have a built in bipod
Fun fact 3:the m1921 ac thompson is in crsed foad and it has a 50 rnd drum mag.
Fun fact 4: the bazooka is unreliable and it can’t front pen the panther. On the other hand, the panzerfaust can front pen the jumbo.
Fun fact 5: 76mm HE sucks against infantry so using any of these tanks will make you suffer, the panther or tiger has way better HE.
Fun fact 6: the americans somehow use an mg42 for their own mg nest which is unrealistic.
Fun fact 7: machine guns can’t one shot a vitality player if he is at full health; even in point blank range (I tested this with a buddy). This is very unrealistic as I can’t imagine any person who can eat an MG shot to the chest yet live to fight back.
Yeah no the tiger sucks Atm nothing to support it
i don’t believe there is an mg42 with the 75 round drums
super bazooka is a 50s weapon so no
no, no no HELL NO, we don’t need any more powercreep than already exist in this god forsaken campaign
Maybe straight belt fed like the 1919
don’t, fg42 2 is much better than just fg42 and will turn the game into the ultimate killer shooting gallery, exactly like the U.S. counterpart of fg42 2. The current strength of the rifles is already sufficient.
I’ve already seen it in berlin.
Stg44 is no different from MP43. I don’t know if it is needed. Thompson with a drum promised to be (hopefully 50 rounds, not 100), but in response yes, better mg42 with a 100 round belt (75 would be a totally minor improvement over the mg34).
Yes, I would like to see these grenade launchers. I really don’t understand what “superbazooka” means. The M9 bazooka makes sense
Don’t please, Powercreep is already felt, Tiger2 and Pershing are so much stronger than anything currently in the campaign that all other tanks will be thrown away.
Right now the Germans can use Tiger or Panther by preference, and the U.S. M4A1 76 or Jumbo depending on the mission.
The Tiger and Pershing will make these tanks be scrapped.
There were no 50 drum mags in Normandy at the beginning of the pacific campaign there was cuz production was not yet there but not here hell the marines were using bolts at the beginning cuz it was so abrupt
maybe though if it’s going to be a tommy than it’s likely to have an STG as a match up
super bazooka is the nickname for the m20 rocket launcher with the same diameter as the panzerschrek. entered actual server in the korean war though apparently it started development in 1944
Puma can barely pen the Jumbo. Practically it’s impossible, you need sideshots. So in practice, both have to flank.
I mean, it shouldn’t even be there. And .30 carbine shouldn’t oneshot. None of the things you said here about it are a problem in any way. The sight and high recoil are.
The PIAT is possibly the best AT weapon in the whole game. The sturmpistole…
Tiger does. The rest of the tanks have basically the same HE.
It’s a placeholder and it’s everywhere. To the point the russians in Moscow have it. It needs fixing.
Eh. FG42-2 should stay in Berlin. MG15 would be better.
Pershing was first deployed in early 1945. M18 vs Tiger 2P would be better.
Wdym ? The Pershing saw combat and since there’s the panther, tiger 1 and the possible tiger 2 it is more than fair that the Americans get the Pershing.
You know a thing called “placeholder”?
It saw combat in january 1945.
Not a lot of fighting going on in Normandy by then.
to add it, we’d need to change Normandy into western front.
it’s still powercreep because tiger 2P and pershing will be too strong for the campaign especially consider that the stuart, M4a2, scott, and jumbo all have sub 100mm of pen
I don’t want to add any new stronger tanks, since some kind of parity has been established, but why do you say that the Tiger 2 was missing in Normandy. That’s exactly where it was actively involved.
But the pershing really did not fight in Normandy, because its first use was noted in February 1945.
I never said it was missing I just don’t want it the power creep will be insane if it gets added is my issue the tiger 2 would be great for battle of the bulge campaign or whatever its gonna be just not Normandy I guess
I misunderstood you in that case. I completely agree. Tiger/Panther and M4A1 76/Jumbo are the limit of powercreep
Yep it’s already bad enough that we have panthers jumbos tigers p47 all in the same campaign
It would work is the did a alternate reality campaign type of thing
yes we do they get a fucking tiger we need perishing now