Yeap, I don’t want mp43 and fg42.
But the hipfire of the fg42 is one shot at close range.
As it should be.
And the thompson do about 8dmg if I remember correctly. It’s already buffed.
If silver weapon orders are not a problem, profit doesn’t really matter where its up to which gun one prefer to pick. I do see some Normandy Axis players get bored that they ended up going to the Eastern Front especially Berlin with almost the exact same high level weapons which some are inevitable to be added to Normandy especially FG42 II and King Tiger as it happened with the Tiger E before.
Axis players going to the Eastern Front be like, too many PPD and PPSh SMGs in the battlefield plus Soviet tanks are strong. Also the fact that Normandy is the only campaign where the Axis enjoy their late war stuff without having to deal with Soviets with their SMGs and tanks. One example was the Tiger E where Tiger drivers enjoy dominating in Normandy against mostly Stuarts and some Shermans.
Stoped taking you seriously when I saw you wrote “trash” over the tommies 
(and bad scope over m1a1 tommy??? What?)
Skill issues.
To each their own weapons preference, and thus, favoured faction.
5 Likes
How are allied players supposed to strafe and killstreak if they can’t see the enemy in their scopes?
1 Like
what the usa straight up gets mini ppsh/mp43 hybrids for everyone with bayonets thrown on their only issue is the sights take getting used to at first
The aim in not that bad on the thompson when you shoot couple of bullet.
It’s when you do full auto that you can’t even see the end gun iron sight sometime.
It’s even worst with the M2.
Hip fire is the only choice right now.
Beretta m38 is better btw.
Shit accuracy, shit bullet velocity, shit sights. Plus recoil is kinda shit since the last major update. They aren’t giving you any comfort in shooting. I like using ppsh, beretta m38 or stg, but I’d prefer 3 grenades over having additional ammo for that .45 piece of shit.
Tommies are only good at cqb and for hipfiring, but in normandy and tunisia you often have to use them on a medium and long range.
The best thompson is 21/28, but it also suffers from using .45
Again: to each their own. I happen to love those, especially in Tunisia. If the challenged op can’t aim with them… doesn’t mean they’re bad. He just prefers axis stuff (maybe without even knowing it)
It’s really just his own preferences.
Like mostly all Normandy “axis/allies have more op stuff than axis/allies, plz nerf/buff uwu” shit posts.
2 Likes
This is just meme…
I dont know where it should start.
Carbines:
I dont know why people always compare the FG with the M2. Like yeah I kinda get it but expecting to do the same shit with an carbine like you could do with an battle rifle is weird art best. The carbine sare very good for close quarter. It has okay recoil, good fire rate for CQC and also consider that it comes with four magazines and not two like the FG. The FG is better when it comes to medium range and imo it should be a gunner weapon but I wouldnt take it in CQC. Ask Grandmaster Carbine aka @Rickyd123 more about carbines.
SMG:
Okay. MP34 is good (its just an MP28 with 32 rounds and the MP28 is crap). But why is M3 worse? Because of lower rof? But why is Sten bad if it has higher rof? Sure its dispersion is bad but rof is pretty nice and MP28 vs. Sten in Africa made Germans cry so I dont get it why it sucks here… or why the Lanchester is good despite having similiar rof and close dispersion numbers to the “awful” Sten?
And Thompsons sucks because of iron sight? Lol. M1 Trash? But why? Also scope lol?
I also dont know why the FNAB is better than the Grease Guns while its as slow and bunky as the M3 (M3 is red because sucks). They also have the same dispersion so IT DOESNT MAKE ANY SENSE CALLING THE M3s BAD BUT MARKING THE FNAB GREEN AND SAYING ITS BETTER THAN THE M3 IF THE STATS ARE THE SAME!
(I also dont get why Beretta M1918 is orange while M1 is red for having lower clip size and higher fire rate… ehhh I dont get any thing here)
M38 text is also meme and one of the main reaons why this post and entire thread is a joke.
MG:
O boi. American MG and battle rifles have the lowest dispersion ingame. So yeah. 20 mags for SA rifle dispersion is kinda fair in the HnG-conefire parody called dispersion balance. Also, German MGs have worse recoil thanks to their rof so yeah fair. MGs with low recoil and “laser” dispersion tend to be kinda powerfull, ask the M1919A6 the best mg ingame ehm the “final good weapon for Allies over 35 levels”. Love dispersion? Play Allies. Love rof? Play Germany.
"Rocket Launchers:"
M9 can easily pen the Tiger side armor, at least I nevcer had issues with that. If you cant pen the Tiger or even the freaking Panther (something which you can even achieve with the M1) with it, then you simply suck, dude.
5 Likes
Russian forum users back at it again. Imagine coming to the English side and complaining about English users? What a freaking shrub.
Btw Axis and Allies Normandy are both fun and winning and loosing as both is about the same. It used to be in the allies favor but sense objective capture time has went up, the balance is pretty much equal.
Iirc the team balance was the same when the last big update came in.
I just dont play US rn because…
- I finished the grind for now and have plently of work elsewhere
- I hate 80% of Normandy maps
- Moscow makes fun again
almost all the imbalance in this game comes from questionable map designs
2 Likes
Panzerfaust and ofehnror can easily pen jumbo from the front as well as all other tanks, while panther and tiger usually need to be killed from the side. That’s the point.
Shit sights, shit accuracy, shit bullet speed. You can’t argue with that.
Sten has huge horizontal recoil.
It shreds in cqb.
BAR has low dispersion? You’re a clown with a diploma, I see.
Those sweeping in with “skill issue” shit. Show your stats, just to be sure it is coming from infinitely better players than TS, kekw.
You first.
2 Likes
1 Like
here
ain’t BAR’s dispersion the lowest of the LMG category?