Man few games i chasing just tanks with AT, do i get a shot on , no
Anyway its been reported, and even if they fix it, will be replace, with a another new bug.
Really, besides WT/Enlisted, how many games have we all played, where every patch breaks something else?
I can think of none
Definitely okay with the patching breaking stuff (as in its pretty normal). Just take comfort in knowing it is acknowledged
Well at end of last game, i think i jagged a tank kill with AT, just going to watch replay, to see if i got the tank, or just everyone around it 
Was face on, not my normal position of on the side or behind, was just so excited to finally get a shot, i just took it with out aiming haha
True, I mean why would they when you have explosive packs.
I would love if they just got rid of the stupid things. Thereâs no reason why they exist when we have AT weapons.
I guess I like AT launchers because with a bit of judgment you can snipe tanks from a mile off.
cant throw a detpack 150 meters plus
so true, and fun 
Precisely 
Ex packs are fine, donât forget you donât get AT squad for a while in game, and even then, the first AT arenât all that good
so x packs are fine, esp for newer players, till you get there x lvl for AT squad
Well watched replay, i ended up with a tank kill, must of burnt up, as it only killed 3x peeps, then i die, and when i respawn, i had a tank kill?
Its not that you cant kill a tank. Its that It is hugely inconsistent. Can fire all ammunition, for only 1 hit to register doing any damage/hitting
Only AT I use is type 97 anti everything rifle in the Pacific. Against infantry. Better than any LMG for defence, low dispersion low mounted recoil and one taps at all ranges plus it pierces multiple enemies. One time I got 4 infantry kills with one blast from the thing. Absolute monster of a gun.
Fair enough. AT rifles are working for me (or at least did the 1 time i used it this week)
Just launchers having issue. Different delivery system
Totally agree, what a beast, almost should be illegal, it is a monster, had much fun with it, when i was doing Pacific.
Thinking on it, i would have to put it as one of my fav things to use in game.
Well, we need to focus on AT rocket launcher because in most campaigns they are the most raliable weapon for infantry to anti-tank. Ex pack and TNT mean more risk and ex pack always miss because it hit the armor and flied away.
Question is not about it doesnât work. It is about it sometimes work and you may need shoot all rockets from a long range to kill 2-3 of the crew. But you may be not so lucky to shoot so many rockets without being killed.
Why bother with an AT weapon when you can have up to three explosive packs that double as an extra powerful anti infantry and anti fortifications grenade? Unless said AT weapon can be used at range to deal with a grey zone camper for example, but that usually means exposing yourself to enemy fire, so most people will just go with a tank.
Well he wasnât greyzone, but at this range, i think it would clearly, be able to reach greyzone areas, and i have done so in past.
Tank wasnât even marked, so yeah, i mark it just to show how far away he is
Ah yes. Love lobbing from down town
Extremely satisfying with piats and pzgr 39s (HEAT)
âŚwhen they are working that is
That was today, only had one misfire as far as i know or have noticed today.
was thinking it was a proximity thing, but last match, it fired close range,
but also, i not had the chance to fire whole lot on one tank yet, to see, as been real tough today, to get behind them, been owned all day
OkâŚi.will have to test more tonight
While I managed more kills tonight with AT. It is still very inconsistent. Many hits not penning or damaging internals. And thatâs on really light Armour
