Not a serious topic to talk about, i just think it is a nice touch that has been part of enlisted and its strange to not see it on this levels
7 Likes
I’ve noticed it with a lot of the recent additions, the background information is either not there at all or it’s lacking in details (some are just 1 sentence saying it’s taking part in x campaign since y month & z year). Agree not a serious topic but I also enjoy reading those little bits of text when scoping out the next squad in the unlock tree.
2 Likes
wtf assaulter 4? does it require exponentially more bronze order for training?
This whole update seems rushed. They didn’t do any CBT again, and quickly put it out before any backlash grew to a considerable size like it did with Stalingrad and it’s full access alongside changes to the MkB.
The real question we really need an assaulter 4?
No, we don’t. Especially not in Moscow. They don’t even have IIIs or even IIs for some of the unit types.
1 Like
gives the squad a badass past like “this squad fought bravely in stalingrad”
i dont think so, that would be ridiculously time consuming.
i still think we should have a research tree. Cus what? Next they will had something like belt fed mg 34`s for level 38? doesnt make sense. Why cant they just let us grind for what we really want? instead of unlocking things we dont want or have already used in other campaigns.
this campaign has became a power creep.
We didn’t need this.
agree. Next they gonna add kv2 and tiger
Please no. We’re playing Moscow, they need to stop adding weapons that weren’t made yet. They already fucked up with the MkB.
1 Like
yeah the fricking fedorov was a ww1 weapon and the mkb wasnt even in moscow. if they love ww1 weapons then they gotta make us a russian civilwar campaign or sm