No reason to restrict what maps you can play by BR at this point. Just let everyone choose 1 map pack to ban

Suggestions
1

See title.

Unless you’re playing Japan, of course. For obvious reasons.

Edit: Yes, it’s about the BR-restrictions on what map you can see. Not… What the guy below me said.

“1 map” means 1 entire campaign’s worth of maps in the pre-merge system. Banning Berlin, for example, collaterally means banning Seelow, Herman Goerring Strasse, Kroll Opera House and so on.

7 Likes
2

you want soviets invanding or defending d-day?

why?

3

but i agree even though @Veekay45 might skin you alive.

4

No.

To clarify, this is intended to address the whole BR-based map thing.

5

or… we could have appropriate maps instead.

… at the same time i wouldn’t mind playing br III on berlin.

6

Yes please, I want my Brewster Buffalos in the Ardennes fighting Semoventes. It would make so many people mad it would be hilarious.

2 Likes
7

Maps should not be tied to BR, honestly.

2 Likes
8

Embrace the lack of realism.

Biplanes in Berlin

4 Likes
9

King Tigers in Moscow lets gooooooo

2 Likes
10

As realistic as japanese medium tanks in the pacific maps.

I love it.

2 Likes
11

I would insta-ban Ardennes, such a clown show of maps

12

I think the “historical correct mode” can be postponed

Unrestricted battles will make this game more interesting,

And I think we should match Soviet and American players together, Japanese and German players together, reduce half of the faction split, and make a more detailed and fair BR matchmaking system possible.

13

Er no thanks, go play customs for that mate

14

Alternativ scenarios when?

Sealion could literally be any BR
Battle inside actual Moscow
US vs USSR in Berlin

1 Like