Next level for normandy’s armored vehicles

Seriously speaking,a tiger II H can be added to normandy instead of an ugly (P)ones. As US side can destroy any tanks using the m8. I also hope allies get m26 pershing as an opposite though there arnt any pershings in this battle historically,obviously ally player want NO MORE SHERMANS.

hall nar, i want pz 3l’s and grey hounds
stugs and M16’s

and MORE SHERMANS i want my M4A3E6

5 Likes

for how much appealing a tiger II H can be, it’s the least thing that normandy needs.

3 Likes

the game needs to have battles over larger areas with armoured cars and light tanks rather then just adding heavier tanks that only leads to adding more heavy tanks and so forth,
so far there is not disadvantage to using heavy tanks other then being a bigger target
would be diffrent if light tanks could out flank them

5 Likes

Seriously speaking, It doesn’t sound serious.

I just hope it’s sarcasm. But Im not 100% sure.

1 Like

Give my my f2p stug finally :unamused:

6 Likes

And also aa vehicles or other like sdkfz. maybe they should be added in earlier grades.

1 Like

:fox_face: Only paywalled, we need your support for the game

1 Like

Tiger II(H) in Normandy alongside Tiger H1 in Tunisia at the same time is going to be brutal for Western tankers

Eh… Not sure it would be a good idea… that thing would be too much. Perhaps some tank destroyer instead? Jagdpanther or something? (They paywalled the Stug…) Allies got the m10, we could invert roles this time, and Allies could get a very sexy tank. Just no idea which.

2 Likes

Sure if the allies get the t95 doom turtle as a counter part, but seriously no it’s this is a fucking stupid decision especially with how much the axis bitched about the jumbo

1 Like

I think Normandy should get the Jagdpanther

3 Likes

On one hand, I’d love that vehicle. There’s nothing more troll worthy than that, perhaps even more so than the kv2!

On the other hand… can this snail quick vehicle even climb small hills???

1 Like

I would rather the devs went more of the route of armored personnel carriers instead of just adding more tanks. I believe somewhere on a QnA that they were thinking of potentially making mobile spawn points, so having APCS that act as mobile spawns would be 10X better than any new tanks. (Though if they did add more tanks, Jagdpanther vs M36 would be nice).

4 Likes

They should add medium bombers ( aka new types of attacker planes)

3 Likes

Spoiler medium bomber are those wo do the bombing run in stalingrad

1 Like

Ju 188 is medium bomber an u can use that in normandy. So why cant we use more of them ?

Is more an attacker than a medium bomber, medium bomber are this

image

It is medium bomber

It not drop more than 2x250kg bomb, is pretty weak for be a medium bomber, wo is suppose do carpet bombing on enemy line