Vehicles kill the game balance for sure, everything revolves around them, they suck to face in battle, tankers keep camping the gray zone, constant noise from airplanes, random bombing kills your whole squad with no way to outplay, ye, they have a quota to meet as they are literally a Gaijin department.
2 Likes
There should be some fine tuning and exceptions to that statement that I made, but that was just a basic idea.
I think there should be less BR tiers overall, I sincerely believe this will help the balance of the game.
I would seriously consider a separate tree for the British and the Italians. I personally donât see the point of combining them.
Some of the bolt actions and semi autos are too high on the BR list which negates their usefulness. For example, Ross rifle, M1 Garand, and M1 Carbine are too far along in the tree.
1 Like
New profile pic?
Did you take the picture yourself?
1 Like
Yeah itâs from an airshow. I got access through my job and saw lots of cool stuff. Corsairs, Bearcats, Hellcats, Skyraiders, to name a few
3 Likes
Jelly. Love airshows.
1 Like
Hello, half a year has passed since the announcement of the merger and the creation of BR. For these half a year you have made this table. Itâs a shame. You had half a YEAR to do it.
2 Likes
There is likely a lot more that hasnât been discussed or shown yet.
Best to release things bit by bit to get feedback and improve instead of releasing everything at once and overwhelming everyone
1 Like
In any case, people see the result. For half a year, the developers made a BR table that any player could do in a day. How should the players take it? Developers do not want or do not know how to work?
1 Like
Bruh, they announced that half a year ago doesnât mean that they started to do this table half an year ago. They announced the merge early because they want to get feedback from us.
And you think this table is the only stuff for the merge? There are also many other thing that they work on this half year, for example economic rework, player compensation, new Ui, last update.
Okay, letâs discuss this.
They had six months to get to work and produce the result.
In a normal, I repeat, in a normal company, developers would have engaged in development immediately after the announcement, rolled out a list of things that would be rebalanced, discussed it with the community, used alpha testers to understand how to balance it all.
What do we have? For six months, one table was made, into which everything was thrown in a row, without even thinking about the balance. It took six months for this. What about the rest?
Events are a stub for saving online, exhausting and not giving rest, designed for the fact that a person will play worrying about lost profits. A sneaky move for me.
What else? Fixing bugs? So they themselves first break, and then fix, the latest update - they just fixed their own mistakes - bots fall on buildings, look at the news, this is not the first time. At the same time, the player still gets stuck in the windows, explosive packages bounce off tanks like a ball, tempest in Normandy does not cause damage, and so on and so forth.
With all this, they were completely unsteady on the development of the game, the Axis in Tunisia is dead and so we have a terrible imbalance in each company. The players believed that the developers threw all their efforts into the development of the game, but in fact, they rolled out a sign made in one day as a result of work for half a year. Itâs a shame. Iâm not saying that there are no weapons there, but they didnât even include premium units there, because they will stop buying them after seeing how the developers threw them.
So yes, as a player I can express to the developers my complete disappointment in them.
4 Likes
And the result seems to be not in line with it.
4 Likes
Bruh, You canât assume they started to draw this table 6 months ago.The merge was announced 4 months ago. There was a major update 2 months ago. They released new UI and some qol updates recently and you say they spend 6 months only to draw a table?
1 Like
Bruh, this is the thing(tech tree) that you need to give feedback on. Previous news didnât mention the details of the tech tree, where is the feedback of tech tree come from? Players didnât like the compensation for Stalingrad, dev adjusted it. Player want equipment have br, dev added it. Player asked for squad preset, dev also added it. Some player want HA, dev said there will be soft br rule. So dev are listening to our feedback. Blaming them wonât work, give constructive feedback instead.
Bruh, people already feared a overbloated level system and we got the very thing. 10 levels bloated for no reason.
People wanted reasoning for BRing and we got Berettas before the M30 Shotgun.
People want better MM and now we get way more queues than before.
What now?
And still doesnt include 100% compensation. Thank you very much.
If we go that low now, you might expect nothing at this end so you wont get dissapointed.
Pretty sure, people wanted like three types per soldier per campaign.
Or maybe because otherwise you will never get any match starts with 10 BR levels for four factions.
If so, we wouldnt have ten levels but your expectations are so low now, that you see everything as an win.
Coming from someone who now starts his replies with bruh for some reason like some youngster, sounds pretty heilarious tbh.
5 Likes
Well, letâs even say that they actually started working in four months, although this only means that the development of the game has not been thought out by the developers. In four months, in terms of a new progression, they released an indistinct screenshot, which they didnât even change much in four months.
And now they have released a table made in a hurry. I repeat, FOUR months. Ignoring bugs (players getting stuck in windows, non-damaging Tempest, etc.), ignoring the balance in the same Tunisia. They released two events with a couple of new squads and an update for the Pacific Ocean with a copy paste. I do not know how for you, but for me it burns only about one thing, they were engaged in anything, but not the development of the game.
2 Likes
Then give your feedback to them lol .
Bruh, previous news only give us the concept, did they say details like tech tree composition, price of stuff after merge?
And you still accepted it lol.
Lol so that is not a result of dev listening to our feedback?
Tons of people like it lol.
Not related lol. Do you really know how soft br rule works?
You donât know there is 10 levels before this news was released. So where is the donât want 10 level feedback come from? A feedback is comment on a released stuff or news. You canât have feedback if the stuff or news wasnât released.
You also use it. You are also a youngster now lol.
More like 2 months, the last major update was released 2 months ago. They also released new Ui and some qol updates. You still think the only thing you need to to do for this merge is this table lol. There is much more thing to do.
Guess literally nobody had this idea before.
It was already clear that there will be a br system similiar to this. This is not rocke science.
I did not really since this was never equal.
According to you, its enough to say br and thats it, even if the sentence doesnt end after br.
The soft br rule only applies if there are enough players for each br/ map restriction and we dont have enough players for the current system.
so you will get Panthers in Moscow or bot only matches again.
You know people wrote more than we want br, right?
And well, the devs copy a lot from War Thunder so it did not really surpise consider that WT has 11.0 BR and ofc the devs need to be similiar high.
And because the devs do most of the things wrong anyway.
Because I want to show you that its just cringe. But I guess, you are beyond that point now.
3 Likes
This just concept. The details is how many level are there, what stuff in each level.
You liked that post and thank them. If you donât accept it why donât say it?
You previously said if there is no soft br rule you will never get any match. But they can just have no soft br rule at all.
Anything before the thing or news released is just a suggestion. The comment on released stuff or news is a feedback, two different stuff. The priority for those two are very different.