New reticle bombers and new commander reticles for allies

Suggestions
1

we would like an update where new bombers are added for all campaigns. (moscow) (normandy) (berlin) (war of the pacific) (stalingrad)
(Tunisia).

Bombsight.jpg.4d49bdb2b29c4b1a104ccf8701ab58fd
Bombsight.jpg.4d49bdb2b29c4b1a104ccf8701ab58fd1680Ă—1050 176 KB

and another thing I wanted to tell you about. Most of the allied tank reticles are not correct, we want them to be able to change the reticles to something better.
image

6 Likes
2

royal we?

3

We think we are too bad to bomb correctly so please add reticles … our royal person will be pleased

1 Like
4

For medium bombers agreed, not fighters though

3 Likes
5

Just historical stuff.

1 Like
6

On one hand, not having reticles helps to keep players that have not practiced out of planes as much (time on the range to practice and have a good feeling of controls is necessary). This way ineffective pilots don’t hog the team’s only bomber. While adding a sight “would make them more effective” also consider that if they are not communicating with their team on the ground, they usually won’t be very effective to begin with.
On the other hand. Adding in sights could allow for drops from higher altitude which is safer for the pilots as well as can potentially increase the spread of bombs.

One of the major things to also be considered though is that speed of the plane also determines where the bomb is going to fall. So would the reticle account for speed? Or perhaps would it list a required speed on the side that must be matched for an accurate drop? - Personally when I’m using a bomber, I either throttle all the way up or all the way down and glide, depending on what I’m trying to hit. Those both drop VERY differently, in a way that I don’t think a reticle could accurately portray.

1 Like