Rename campaigns into fronts!
For example, Moscow Campaign would become Eastern Front
Where level 1-34 take place in Moscow and starting from level 35 will take place in like Stalingrad or sth
This way, when a new campaign is out, you don’t have to grind for basic squads again, and new weapons can be added to later campaigns. And you can possibly start straight from level 35 Stalingrad without completing 1-34 Moscow too
Share your opinions too!
9 Likes
That could be a great idea. You can have a front and even battles in the front, Moscow and Stalingrad for example. You unlock items in one battle in the front, they unlock in the other battles in the front.
You can play the front, giving a rotation of the battles and the maps, or you can play a specific battle and it’s maps.
This will be good, keeping items from one battle out of other battles on the front where they don’t make sense, and it would make the grind significantly less, while still being able to have items unique to certain battles.
It’s just an example
Yeah I agree, Stalingrad is just berlin with snow
But I am not really familiar with Eastern Front to give another interesting example
As for Japan, I would love to see China Theatre as it’s not depicted in many games (Because CCP bans the game in China if they do that), but its quite unlikely that they will add it…
Pacific would be great too
1 Like
I´m 100% behind you.
But you know it will be very hard in that Bushes against Bots, who see through Bushes.
I feel that extremly in Tunisia where’s the hardest Path are the Bushpath.
i would appreciate simply , more Maps and Bigger Maps in that four Campaigns we have.
That Train Map is so stupid because its only on Berlin Campaign…
Longer Map Bigger Map More Train Eskorts!
1 Like
Battle of the Caucasus would be better as you get Stalingrad and Mountain warfare
1 Like
Imma copy and paste this from another post
"Sub campaign ideas-
Tunisia and Sicily: Don’t even need to change anything with this campaign, add Sicily maps and change desert camo and boom.
Moscow and Stalingrad: This one is kinda tough so maybe let the T-50 and Pz IV F temporarily become a T-34 and Pz IV F/1 on stalingrad maps, so same campaign only two tanks change within certain maps.
Normandy and Battle of the Bulge: Not sure about this one but honestly this campaign doesn’t need any differences, just new maps with different camo.
Berlin: Nothing can be added here."
If people don’t want Stalingrad or something that could work with the current campaigns then I disagree with adding a new campaign like a Pacific campaign any time soon. We need to finish what we already have content wise before moving and separating our playerbase further. Aren’t there still people complaining that there’s no STG, yet you suggest the devs to focus all the way on creating Japanese models, Japanese weapons, amphibious vehicles, entirely new maps, and new UI to present this all?
Yes, we need goods news:
1 Like
It’s a good thing you’ll get all four of those in Stalingrad, lol
No. Same gun, tanks and weapon.
Just new maps.
Lol.
could ppl pls stop with this nonsense?
Let me present to you our newest complaining on the forums:
-Berlin is the same as Moscow but in Germany
-Tunis is the same as Normandy but with sand
-Stalingrad is the same as Germany but not being a country
-Japan is the same as Britain but without white ppl.
You know how ridiculous you guys sound?
Nobody said that not even one “-” is barely correct.
Keep it real.
People just tend to complain about copy/past as soon as they have unlock their third MP40.
If stalingrad is implemented as a unique campaign you could unlock a total of 5 MP40 around the game and a few MP38 too.
And that’s not some made up nonsense like when you say “people say tunisia is normandy with sand”, that a fact.
Thats not my point.
What I am saying is that there is a right to be more than just one city map, regardless of there being snow, desert, ruins or whatever.
Berlin is already the same as moscow because of what? there being buildings?
I disagree with this mindset, what you guys call “copy paste” is saying that there should not be ANY new maps.
That’s the thing though. I’ve never asked for it to be a unique campaign. I’ve been an advocate for the Fronts idea for months now and have talked about it on other recent threads
Moscow - Eastern Front 1941-1943
Normandy - Western Front 1944-1945
Berlin - Eastern Front 1944-1945
Tunisia- North Africa
Stalingrad would fall under the same as Moscow. There would be one campaign tree for the front and items unlocked would be limited per campaign based on where they were used. Squads will still have to be unlocked. So you would just be able to apply the weapons if you earned them through Moscow.
PTRS-41 MG 30/ Solothurn 31.M Golyószóró, Danuvia 39M, Orița M1941, ZB vz. 30 FÉG 35M the Early war T-34 variants and new KV tank mid war Panzer 4s and 3s, Romanian R35, 38M Toldi, IAR 81
I’m just afraid it will feel like this:
“It’s not the same weapon, this one got a solid wood cross and this one is laminate wood…”
kar98 intensify