All the current campaigns need new maps, and people want multiple new campaigns as well.
To fix this add new maps as new campaigns, but based within current campaigns.
Some examples I have:
Normandy-Battle of the Bulge.
Probably the most wanted campaign by Normandy lovers to be added. All the current equipment in Normandy would work perfectly fine for this. Also would give good excuse for Jumbo and Chaffee, just need clothing changes.
Moscow-Leningrad.
Same equipment here works as well, also gives good excuse for T-50.
Tunisia-Sicily.
An Italian campaign would be nice but this is the closest thing we will get because Italian forces are still axis at this point. Besides Italy would have Panthers and Tigers but no Jumbo so I don’t think people would like that.
Stalingrad-Leningrad again (lazy)
Knowing that the devs are lazy and love copypaste this would totally work in their favor and just be same map with different gear.
Berlin-More sealow heights type maps.
I’m no expert in this area, but literally more maps out of the city would work.
With hopes and desires of a new Pacific campaign this would easily work here, same gear just different campaign maps.
All in all this is what could be done to add new campaigns without actually splitting the playerbase and forcing new grinds. Is a few extra select gear actually worth making a entirely new campaign (cough stalingrad)?
If this were ever to happen Normandy should be the first campaign to try it out as it’s the most populated. Just my 2 cents.
5 Likes
It’s very good solution. In this game, campaigns already have several different maps so I believe it is not difficult to implement them. (For example, Normandy campaign have three map files: coasts area, fortified coast and urban area)
1 Like
Would also give an excuse for the MkB, or at least a slightly better justification.
1 Like
+1 here. i think this is awesome idea.
Good job. 
1 Like
I most strongly agree with extending Normandy into later war Western Front campaigns in some way. Because a new campaign would pretty much be copy-paste in terms of both maps and equipment. If anything, late Western campaigns that I think could work are the “Siegfried Line campaign” and the “Western Allied invasion of Germany” in which there’d be a lot of unique maps (i.e. boggy Netherlands, wooded Germany, etc.), and a wide range of allied troops with unique late-war weapons. As for Axis, they could get a wide range of cool Czech weapons. In the latter campaign, axis would also have Hungary on their side.
But Tunisia-Sicily, not so much. To begin with, they’re in different continents/campaigns. I’d rather have an Sicily/Italy campaign. It’d be only somewhat similar to Western Front campaigns, but with new scenery and added squad/weapon diversity on both sides.
Perhaps a Front system would work even better, with a gear-based matchmaker sending you to a campaign based on your equipped gear. Of course, it would only be active with a sufficient player-base in the respective front.
3 Likes
Sicily was suggested is because Tunisia has Italian units and Italy only fought in Sicily and surrendered before the allies made it into Italy.
I was planning on making this suggestion, too. This is the most logical thing they could do.
KV1s wouldn’t be so bad in the Moscow/Leningrad/Novgorod campaign since we would get Tiger 1, too.
1 Like
This is a huge solution to a lot of problems Enlisted had/might have in the future. I don’t get why people are piling in on a non constructive thread vs this one which actually has a real solution
1 Like
Thanks for the feedback and I agree