Like the title says it is way too “OP” gun. I think it is “laser” rifle.
What about other thoughts about this gun.
And sorry if there is many post about this. 
6 Likes
How many post does this make now? But, yes. At least that piece of jap nonsense needs a nerf.
3 Likes
thats what the USA gets to deal with in exchange for having better paratroopers, tanks, CAS, and machine guns
4 Likes
Then again many people missed out on paras and new players cannot ever get them if Darkflow doesnt add a wa to get old vent squads.
1 Like
*Old event
1 Like
i think its generally unfair to japan that 3 other countries have BR5 paratroopers in the store 24/7 for purchase yet japan only had BR2 paratroopers available in an event one year ago
5 Likes
Okay then a way to get old event squads as well as more Japanese paras.
1 Like
Don’t worry. The US will get the T20 early rifle in the next major update. It was leaked in the latest test server. Then we will also get the chance to return the favour to the Japanese. Just save up enough silver to build your 9-man infantry squads.
Reason of nerf: my skill issue.
4 Likes
In fact, I think all full-power automatic rifles should be appropriately nerfed
For some powerful players, the full-power automatic rifle has an overwhelming advantage against all weapons
Submachine guns are too weak, and machine guns are too heavy. As long as you have an automatic rifle, you can easily eliminate a large number of enemies by yourself with the help of a bunker.
This makes other weapons seem useless
5 Likes
What is the value of Japan’s BR5 without it?
3 Likes
Regardless how justified the nerf would be, id just make BR lock preventing high BR weapons to appear in low BR games.
aka BR 3-4, I count both as low BR since in both BR’s the equipment is by far inferior compared to BR5.
1 Like
I still don’t understand why Japan should have a BRV. It’s destined to be a fantasy, full of unrealistic shit.
3 Likes
Well if you take out every questionable gun & vehicle out of the TT you are looking at rather boring faction nothing to unlock.
Then again, with current lineup id say current equipment would be rather OP if the Japan was locked to BR3-4 max.
Thing is, if they didn’t nerfed the M2 which was breaking Pacific, why would they nerf the counter to that weapon? Crying for one side is not fair, cry fot both, but don’t cry for me Argentina.
3 Likes
Most likely to balance the faction out or else Germany BR5 will fight 2 faction so they may be lack of players. Also BR4 US will suffer because they will be mainly fighting Japan, Japan will have their most elite players while most elite US player will be in BR5 fighting Germany.
tell me reason why not nerf gun that has:
- 30 rounds mag (same size as m2 carbine) → AVT40 and FG42 II have 15 and 20 mags
- full SA damage (equivalent to AVT40/FG42 II) → m2 carbine has AR damage
- recoil of ~m2 carbine → FG42 II and AVT40 get 2-3 times more recoil per bullet
- has best dispersion out of all comparable guns from other factions.
only downside is that it blinds you when you fire, but you can still see enemy cause of flickering speed.
it basically has best characteristics out of AVT40, FG42 II and m2 carbine.
m2 is balanced weapon compared to germany/soviets. it is not its fault for devs uptiering japan without any weapons to counter to it.
5 Likes
idk, perhaps because its arguably one and only weapon thats better than its counter part in br5?
Or are we also nerfing every US weapon / vehicle to match Japan br5 arsenal ?
1 Like
Rifle which uses the same ammo as Fedorov, yet it does 10 % more damage with 15 % less recoil.
if one OP weapon is only thing holding japan on BR5, then maybe japan shouldnt have been on BR5. japan should have been BR3 faction and there wouldnt have been so much nonsense about it.