Need for improvement of additional troops for the squad

[NISHIKAWA]

The squads added in both the Stalingrad and Pacific campaigns differed in the types of troops that could be added to the squads compared to the earlier campaigns. However, at that time, they were only allowed to fight in the camps within the campaign.
However, currently there is an imbalance in some specific countries due to the effects of integration. The newly added Japanese military. Due to the impact of the replacement of medics with some squads of troops that appeared in the Stalingrad campaign, a situation exists where Japanese squads are unable to achieve the conditions that other countries can equip them with.
The reason why only Japanese forces are included is that the US forces already have the same equipment as the opposing campaign in other campaigns (Normandy, Tunisia).
The Japanese Army has no equipment appropriated from other campaigns, and since it was introduced in a new campaign, it cannot be replaced.
The upgrade has three choices of troops, some of which can no longer be equipped due to the effect of being replaced by medics.
I would like to see a solution to this problem.
(As a suggestion, if there are no plans to add new squads, I think we should add a fourth option for the Japanese army or uniformly organize and unify all the military upgrades for each country…)
I have identified 8 different military detachments with differences that can currently be confirmed on my end.I couldn’t put up a screenshot because the number of screenshots reached the limit, but the American side has additional equipment for squads similar to the Germans and Soviets.

★AssaulterSquad★

★ATSquad★

★CommunicationSquad★

★EnginnerSquad★

★LMGSquad★

★MortorSquad★

★RifleSquad★

★SniperSquad★

[Raf1307]

The screenshots you need are the old campaign progression screenshots, since that’s the gist of your argument. The ones you posted will be hard to understand for many, but that aside, your argument is solid.
There are significant issues that remain unresolved post - merger.
Regrettably those are not the priority - apparently having your inaccurate uniform on the paratroopers flapping in the wind takes priority over squad progression parity…
I know its disappointing, but Enlisted is one of those games that you need to get used to disappointment as we get “upgrades and improvements” none ever asked for…

[NISHIKAWA]

I have a bitter experience with what you are talking about: …
Even now, the management is more concerned about appearance than balance…
But the airborne squadrons that are being whispered about, compared to the event airborne squadrons,
The airborne squadrons that are charged for are in a half-assed state where the airborne container packages have not been modified to match the appropriate BR, and I must say that the way the modifications are overseen is also a mess. … (Soviet Airborne retains the proper BR container package for both events and billing.)

[TheUnclaimedOne-psn]

It looks like they’ve mainly replace Assaulter’s, which the Medic is basically a flavored Assaulter. I see no issue here

[Raf1307]

Just when I thought all was lost, in comes @Euthymia07 to the rescue.

The stat sheets you need to support your argument are here:

Enlisted Resource

Navigate to the squads menu and its all here.