well super pershing should also be there for balancing reasons.
Wouldnāt really make a difference, both Pershings preform similar.
but one has much better penetration(40-50mm extra) giving it more area where it could penetrate KT and has some extra armor that will help with survivability.
I feel alot of people forget this: The devs tend to add only what a nation needs and nothing more to keep everything balanced. (Past stuff like the KV-1 with a different gun at B.R 4)
Logically the US would probably only need a better AR at this point.
If they add a Super Persh to the game, You can expect the Japanese may get something new as well.
I love the prototypes in this gameā¦that were built and functional during WWII. Everything from before Germany invaded Poland to the Japaneseās unconditional surrender on the USS Missouri, if it had a functional prototype then itās fair game far as I care and far as the devs have stated. Paper bullcrap I can definitely live without. There are a lot of firearms I never even knew existed before seeing them in this game, and I love that
The uh, well I like to call them āHeavy Pershing Variantsā as they were all built on lengthened Pershing chassis, but heavy prototypes we made dead end and right after end of the war. Yeah, Iād definitely like to own some Krauts in them things
Seriously. The US doesnāt have a single paper weapon or vehicle anywhere in its TT meanwhile everyone else has at least 1 if not several. We can get ourselves a couple more prototypes to even the playing field
There was a news thread announcing Tokyo Arsenal and that batch of Japan weapons and other vehicles. Pershing and Super Pershing and Ho-Ri were announced but it was said not ready for the updated. After someone asked, Euthymia (Helper) replied that ātheseā are tech tree.
The question is, does ātheseā include Super Pershing? Iād say yes based on how I read it but we all know that nothing is final until itās final. Or later.
editā¦ āall of theseā
https://forum.enlisted.net/en/t/weapons-and-vehicles-of-the-next-update/131951/14
No heās not the only one who knows this, again, youāre embarassing yourself.
Iād gladly say eat your own words but since itās not totally clear if itās referencing everything or just what was coming on that update, Iāll leave it open to interpretation.
Lmao Iām allowed to have my own personal opinion champ. Seems youāre the one who has a stick up your shitter. Ahh yes the info from a helper in a dev blog about other equipment. Is that the best you can scrape together? Iāll believe it when a developer says it in a dev blog about the super Pershing.
Only embarrassment here is you, trying to jump on someone elseās argument. Do your own research if youāre trying to shoot down someoneās opinion/argument. Lazy.
Highly doubt he was referring to the super Pershing. Most likely referring to the other equivalent that was coming to the game at that time. I appreciate you taking the time to find it but Iāll believe it when an actual developer says it in a post dedicated to it.
Highly doubt he was referring to the super Pershing. Most likely referring to the other equivalent that was coming to the game at that time. I appreciate you taking the time to find it but Iāll believe it when an actual developer says it in a post dedicated to it.
I donāt think that she has ever posted anything incorrectly that Iāve noticed. But the devās can change course and the wording certainly isnāt air tight given that 3 tanks were NOT in that update. But 2 of those 3 are now out (Pershing and Ho-Ri) and are tech tree. They were in the same gray area as were not included in the release at the time.
@Euthymia07 maybe can clarify?
Otherwiseā¦ Weāll see!
Fair, weāll see.