Don’t these kind of not exist?
1 Like
All the Pershing variations with the 90mm were made for panthers and tiger 2s. The super Pershing wasn’t introduced separately to deal with tiger 2s. The solution to tiger 1s wasn’t the Pershing, it was the 76mm Sherman.
1 Like
The announcement for the update that brought the Pershing
2 Likes
Again
The only announced both Pershings, they never confirmed either would be in the TT although at least one was likely to be. If it was confirmed, the other people on this thread would have confirmed it already.
1 Like
Bet you think the Jumbo Sherman is a good counterpart to the Tiger too instead of its intended roll of an Assault Tank, essentially being the Allies’ StuG
1 Like
It’s in the comments dude. They said it in the comments
1 Like
Post it then, you’re the only one who knows this apparently
1 Like
Again
All the Pershing variations with the 90mm were made for panthers and tiger 2s. The super Pershing wasn’t introduced separately to deal with tiger 2s. The solution to tiger 1s wasn’t the Pershing, it was the 76mm Sherman.
1 Like
You got at least one eyeball and one hand. Go find it yourself. I just got back from my suspension 3 hours ago. I ain’t gonna go hunt down the answer to your question when I told you where it is, I got other people to argue with
2 Likes
Again, both are uparmored and upgunned variants of previous tanks. It makes sense they’re more equal than regular counterparts
1 Like
Because your answer doesn’t exist. If it did, the many other people on this post would have pointed it out already because you came late.
1 Like
All I can tell you is what I remember reading buddy. I’m not hunting it down for you
1 Like
You must have dreamed it, because you’re the only one who remembers it.
1 Like
I believe Super Pershing should be in tech tree. It is the fairest possible counter to Tiger 2 H
Classic Pershing has similar power level to Tiger 2 P.
6 Likes
Fair argument, but the super Pershing still has a similar performance to the regular Pershing. Still struggles to penetrate/ is frontally penetrated by the Tiger 2. I don’t see it being an issue as a premium.
1 Like
Well, in that case T29 or T30 would have to be top tech tree US tank.
But that’s basically even more “rare” than Super Pershing. Suepr Pershing was in combat. If I remember correctly.
6 Likes
Super Pershing was in combat but there was only 1 out of the 2 actually in Europe.
1 Like
again relevancy? shall i list all of the weapons that were either obsolete (not used in combat in ww2), were designed as prototypes or were even just paper weapons but we still have them in tech tree?
3 Likes
Go for it, I’ve already acknowledged that there are already too many prototypes in the tech tree. Hence why I don’t want it there. I dislike it but majority of them are there to fill holes for balancing reasons.
1 Like