yeah but then you would have to uptier german MGS which are better at every tier than Americas, sorry but outside the stinger most us mgs are mediocre for there tier only better then japans.
I agree. But the whole time I try to explain to you that here is something like shooting too fast.
If I can kill somebody in 0.2s with 3 bullets, killing him in 0.1 seconds with 6 bullets is not an improvement as I waste a lot of ammo for unnoticeable gain in TTK.
(Small explanation: I assumed the same total burst time 0.2s as the shortest time you can hold LMB for. Of course it depends on the person etc. but it’s just for illustration of what I mean. The slower your reflex and the higher the rof, the bigger the effect.)
you say over 800 is a nerf then ask for 1200 hmm
how about the fact most German mg;'s were used on bipods or tripods an not like the BAR from the shoulder, i know a huge buff to accuracy while using a bipod but a huge nerf when firing from the hip or shoulder. it would make german machine guns historically accurate.
Because that’s the rof this gun had irl and it’s iconic because of it.
I know that average enlisted player is used to power creep and constant bitching of faction mains to the point doing stuff for fun may seem suspicious.
Jokes on you. That’s exactly what I’ve been suggesting for the past ±4 years
places hand on should and pulls in for a hug, (do you accept)
in enlisted there are heavy and light machine guns most germans are heavy the bar is a light and was used as a rifle, some were shoulder fire some like the stinger hip fired. i think that each playing like in real life would be good and not all acting like rifle caliber smg;'s would be a good thing.
1 Like
The MG42 should have a rate of fire of 1500 and the MG45 1800 where both weapons should have A belt of 250 bullets to be realistic with this iconic weapon
If you say it is unfair and it is strong I remind you that the Germans suffer against the PPSH41 with a 71-round drum magazine With a Cadence of over 1000 and climbs more improved, Then it would be fair to only limit the German weapon but not the Soviet one like the Thompson of the Allies
show me a picture of one that is not a fortified position, or hell a 250 round box that a soldier could carry and fire
The same can I say about the T20, AS-44, where did they fight in WW2?
The MG42 Soldiers used it with 100-150 on foot and there is no problem that the MG42 has 1500, if you don’t like this problem But it was used like this
well my only issues are the abscense of this for allies
and the mg42 for americans.
the rest is ok .
i mean at some point there wont be weapons to add.
Only reason is that because DF wants GER to suffer remember at first they placed MP40 at BR3 (and Dicker at BR4), they want to keep us weak and underpowered so Soviets and Americans could roleplay as a movie star fighting ebil nabzis and save the Europe from demons.
We’ve only got MG42 100 because we were complaining for years for unfair treatment sadly there are not a single person except me that would fight for justice for Ger at BR2.
the question is not if they did but if they could, sorry but a german 250 round that could be used outside a bipod is fiction the stinger is fact, ok i want a us tank with a gun and armor equal to a tiger 2, i mean if we are working of pure copium
They must receive the Finnish Suomi KP-31 to counter the PPSH41 in BR I-III
How does it compare vs Suomi KP-26 (it was a gold order)? Anyway they would probably place it at BR3 anyway while our BR2 would still be too damn weak. And BR5 doesn’t have a free PPSh-41 equivalent since MP717 got removed and Kiraly sucks.
It has a 71-round magazine, more precision, more rate of fire
It’s already a premium so not gonna happen. DF hidden too many cool guns behind premiums or GO or Stalingrad FA and left us with nothing.
It doesn’t matter, it should be TT, as there is another PPSH41 Premium with the Soviets, the same should happen with the Germans.
1 Like
DF will always find new excuse on the planet to not give us better smgs at BR2, BR3 and BR5 