Yes it is and yes it does. Just think about it. 7.92x33 vs 7.62x39
Meanwhile .45 is 11.43×23 and 9mm is well, 9x19
You can tell they’re 2 completely different categories.
Nah. Imo .45 is just a useless caliber in handguns. It doesn’t have the mag capacity 9mm pistols have, and it’s still fairly weak compared to actually strong handgun calibers like .44 magnum. Imo kindal ike that awkward middleground.
Yeah, that’s drugs. They mess up your brain so you can just ignore the pain and keep going as long as possible. You’ll need a shotgun for that.
He also did the test, which (unsuprisingly) proved that while the .45 has a little bit more power, it’s barely noticable, as they are very similar rounds.
Well, in terms of conceal carrying, (I assume you’re from the US as well) you’re not really going to be able to carry a .357 or .44 as easily as a 9mm or .45.
It’s a choice between power or mag size. I fall on power, as I like to think I’m a decent shot lmao.
If you want to talk about awkward middle grounds, we need to talk about .40 lmfao
Even a shotgun may not stop a crackhead. Lmao
Eh. I still do believe the 9mm to just not be powerful enough, but I admittedly have overblown it to others. I see that after watching the video.
It’s mostly preference, but I still prefer .45 I’d say.
I mean, you can conceal a short barreled .357 possibly better than most semi-auto pistols. Though if concealabillity is what you want, something like a makarov or PPK might be more what you’re looking for.
I’d say mag capacity is better though. As a normal person will fall from a single well placed shot from either caliber, and I’d rather have 15 chances to hit than 7/8.
I mean, I don’t think even a crachead can keep going if he has no head.
I myself believe it’s powerful enough simply due to the fact that it’s been successfully used by militaries all over the world for over 114 years.
Maybe not better, but about the same. You play up to the best Axis weapons and basically revolutionary weapons to say "well okay, a little better.
When I opened the PCA in Berlin I said “my God, it’s a laser rifle”. The best weapons of the parties have to be cool.
The M1919 is cool, isn’t it? I think everyone would be offended if it became mediocre.
So, source on MKbs actually being fired by Germans in Stalingrad?
It’s not rare to see at all either. Every player on the German side will be using it as much as possible.
How are they OP? The Soviets literally use 99% of games.
And to counter the PPSh-41, guess what, Germany gets the same PPSh-41 (speaking of Stalingrad here).
As far as Moscow goes, absolutely no MKb 42s would be seen there, and (at least in my experience) Germany does just fine with the weapons, tanks and planes they have (save for T-50 the terminator).
I was a bit off in Moscow. Roughly 35 were there at the end of it.
But in Stalingrad, It’s likely over 1000 were issued around there. It’s a bit iffy, but it’s more historical than T50 in Moscow.
i was talking about Moscow.
And yeah, if you say Soviets aren’t heavily advantaged there, go play the axis for a week and then come back.
Nope, they don’t.
What do they have that’s better than the soviets? Well, LMGs, Bf110, the first panzer IV , Mkb and, yeah, that’s it!
Soviets have the advantage in all ranges except super long range and in nearly all weapon categories. And since the axis get literal garbage early game, noone plays them, so allies also have better players. I believe the Mkb was mostly added to actually get someone to play the faction.
if anton keeping nerf the weapon, why don’t i go to battlefield? The reason that i play this game is only bacause of shot time to kill. Now, someone got chance to kill me even i shot by MP43 first? Anton did that really make sense? It is enlisted or superman battlefield? Before i purchase more please tell me if you want to do a game as battlefield or a real war game, because i already waste about 400 pounds. I shouldn’t waste more in a superman battlefield game as an idiot.
They are different for the reason that Fedorov can kill with 1 hit. This is a critical difference.
Right now the 7.92x33 does little more damage than the .30 or .45 acp. Although the energy of the bullets is colossally different.
Now the MP43 is an SMG with slightly higher damage and lower rate of fire along with longer reload times.
25% extra damage is “slightly”?
The main thing is that with the improvement Fedorov has damage comparable to semiautomatic rifles, which makes it possible to knock the enemy to the ground with the first shot.
Can the MP43 do that? No.
It used to require 2 rounds per kill just as much everywhere else, but there was a much higher probability that if an opponent was even slightly wounded, he would be killed immediately.
Now the mp43 has 7% more damage than a Thompson with a .45 acp, while having significantly less rate of fire. It is not an assault rifle, but an SMG with slightly increased damage. Now almost all Axis SMGs have more DPS, which is absurd.
And so Fededorov:
1)Has 25% more damage,
2)Can kill an enemy with 1 shot up to 30-40 meters
3) same ROF, which when you take damage into account means 25% more DPS
4) more damage in one magazine
5) more ammo and more damage per ammo (125 at fedorov with more damage, vs 120 at mp43). Considering the mkb35 has only 100 rounds, so should the fedorov.
On the downside, the fedorov has more recoil, that’s true.
The MP43 should not be a mediocre SMG.